top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 90 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Ken Paxton just keeps doing his best Rafael Cruz impression and running away from anyone who asks him a question...

Talarico signed up for three debates and said he'll show up even if Paxton doesn't.

Cruz is slimey, but he's a legitimate master debater, he can slime his way out of shit most people can't, and Paxton is just expecting it to work out.

As long as Talarico doesn't start talking about taking people's guns, he's got this in the bag.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 72 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    Talarico signed up for three debates and said he’ll show up even if Paxton doesn’t.

    Yes. Get up there and laugh at am empty podium if you have to. It was beyond frustrating in 2024 when the Harris campaign was like "ok, I guess the debates are cancelled". No! Make a show of it. Stand on stage for an hour and read everything wrong your opponent has every done. Dare them to show up next time. Do something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    It was beyond frustrating in 2024 when the Harris campaign was like “ok, I guess the debates are cancelled”.

    They really did run a terrible campaign.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Especially the part where they didn't have a primary and picked the VP of the unpopular incumbent.

    I fully believe if they had a primary the winner would be president

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 weeks ago

    For those who have forgotten the 2020 primaries, she also had no rizz.

    I get it, they were afraid of losing the funds they had raised, but it stood to reason that everyone who wanted Biden to step down would see her as partly responsible too.

    I'm a tin hat wearer who doubts the veracity of some of the 2024 election results... So I'm on the fence of whether that would have been different with a more compelling Democratic candidate.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 2 weeks ago

    They briefly got some actual traction when Walz was calling Republicans "weird," but then some idiot strategist stepped in and told him to stop. The campaign fell back to being anodyne and uninspiring after that, and then they tried to bring Liz Cheney in and everything just felt like it was going through the motions and expecting to have the thing handed to them on a silver platter.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago

    All part of the riches plan.

    If you think it was a coincidence that he beat two women and almost an old man, I have some ocean front property in South Dakota to give you.

    Democrats play good cop but they are still cops

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago

    Two things felt painfully obvious:

    1. They, being wealthy political class themselves, were completely detached from the people's plight and motivations.

    2. They knew no matter how badly they threw the fight, they could still be chilling back, buying low and selling exponentially high through whatever easily avoidable economic crisis hit our (not their) country next.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 2 weeks ago* (1 child)

    No! Make a show of it. Stand on stage for an hour and read everything wrong your opponent has every done

    That happened here in Romania last presidential election. Our neofascist candidate (Simion) got dunked on by the neoliberal (Dan) in the first debate, so he came up with excuse after excuse as to why he couldn't come to the rest.

    The media companies got pissed off, and instead of cancelling decided to dunk on Simion by asking the questions to Dan and playing the absolute worst clips they could find of Simion answering those questions. Definitely didn't singlehandedly lose Simion the election, but it definitely didn't help him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Damn... It must be really nice to have media companies who are actually against fascism...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    That's giving them far too much credit. They're against losing all that delicious ad revenue from the debates and wanted to make an example of him. If Dan had cancelled, they'd have done the same to him in a heartbeat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 17 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    Ken Paxton just keeps doing his best Rafael Cruz impression and running away from anyone who asks him a question…

    Greg Abbott pioneered the strategy of just ignoring your actual opponent and scream "The communists are coming to take your guns!" at rallies hosted by your billionaire friends. To date, it's kinda-sorta worked. Republicans have a stranglehold on the state senate due to gerrymandered districts. All the statewide offices are reliably Republican, year in and year out. And the Republican base loves to see a candidate throwing out red meat far more than a candidate who treats liberal opponents as serious contenders for office.

    As long as Talarico doesn’t start talking about taking people’s guns, he’s got this in the bag.

    Anyone who thinks Democrats have a statewide office in a bright-red state in the bag because the Republican is ignoring them, is delusional.

    You'll know Paxton is in trouble when he starts crying about the liberal media not giving him enough attention and demanding a dozen debates a week with Talarico straight through election day.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago

    Having lived in Texas for 39 years, I don't think it's delusional this time. Wendy Davis, Beto O'Rourke, Colin Allred...I wanted all of them to win but knew it was super unlikely.

    What's different this time is that Paxton has such a lengthy, tainted history in Texas. He's made lifelong enemies of so many Republicans in this state, and Talarico is so very, very palatable to them with his level of comfort framing all of this through Christianity. Obviously, nothing is in the bag, but I have confidence in this race for Talarico I never had for the other 3 candidates I mentioned

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 60 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    There is a reason Reagan and the neocons were founded and backed by corpos.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 55 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    The only thing that actually trickles down from the 1% is piss.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    That's literally what the term originally alluded to, it was written by a critic of tax cuts for the wealthy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 2 weeks ago

    shame a huge number of americans keep voting to be fucked over

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    The real difficulty is with the vast wealth and power in the hands of the few and the unscrupulous who represent or control capital. Hundreds of laws of Congress and the state legislatures are in the interest of these men and against the interests of workingmen. These need to be exposed and repealed. All laws on corporations, on taxation, on trusts, wills, descent, and the like, need examination and extensive change. This is a government of the people, by the people, and for the people no longer. It is a government of corporations, by corporations, and for corporations. — Rutherford B. Hayes, 1888

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 21 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    Talarico is saying the right things. He deserves a few bucks. The others, not so much. Democrats, in general stood by and let all this corruption go on.
    Support only those who understand the problem but understand that we need many more to actually actually change things.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    You ever get the feeling that you've been manipulated into hating the political opposition to fascism?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

    Democrats aren't the opposition to fascism, they're its beauticians. They don't want to fight fascism, they want a version of fascism that follows the rules of respectability politics. They want a sensible, noncorrupt fascism that keeps thorough records of the people it kidnaps. They want a gentle fascism with body cameras to make sure the kidnappings stay "nonviolent" while they get a first person view of families being destroyed. They want a fascism with more humane concentration camps.

    You know who is the actual political opposition to fascism? The mutual aid group in your city. The neighborhood group chat where community members talk to each other and keep each other safe. The rapid response networks. The tenant's rights organizers. All the people out there building alternative power structures.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 13 points 2 weeks ago

    Give em hell kid.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 weeks ago

    Also note that this is not a D vs R situation. It is the people vs those who keep taking advantage of the leadership we afford them.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

    I made this meme like ten years ago:

    Do you get it? The police state is two thousand years old. The New Testament describes a decentralized autonomous organization of secret police at an eighth grade reading level. Epstein was a Mossad agent - so, a cop - and is thus alive because of that. We do something called pairing, which is a big part of how "the battle is won," according to them dum dum Christians, and so Epstein was paired with Maxwell, and thus Epstein disappeared and there are many loose ends of parallel investigations that just go poof, as far as suspicion of rats in criminal networks go. Trump/Hunter Biden/Clintons are all cops. That's how won the battle is. We don't give evil a chance to reach power. But, I'm just some retard doing his counterintelligence job on the internet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Looks like the Democrats have finally refined their messaging, now all they need to do is form a coalition more powerful than the establishment DINO centrists.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago

    The bullshit in here is strong:

    This is Paxton plus way more than I can put in here:

    On July 28, 2015, a state grand jury indicted Paxton on three criminal charges:[276] two counts of securities fraud (a first-degree felony) and one count of failing to register with state securities regulators (a third-degree felony).[277][278] Paxton's indictment marked the first such criminal indictment of a Texas attorney general in thirty-two years since Texas attorney general Jim Mattox was indicted for bribery in 1983.[279] The complainants in the case are Joel Hochberg, a Florida businessman, and Byron Cook, a Republican and former member of the Texas House of Representatives.[280][281] Paxton and Cook were former friends and roommates while serving together in the Texas House.[281] Three special prosecutors were trying the state's case.[282]

    In October 2020, seven of Paxton's top aides published a letter to the office's director of human resources, accusing Paxton of improper influence, abuse of office, bribery and other crimes, and said they had provided information to law enforcement and asked them to investigate.[318][319] The letter was signed by first assistant attorney general Jeff Mateer,[319][318] and the deputy and deputy attorneys general overseeing the office's divisions for criminal investigations, civil litigation, administration, and policy.[318] Paxton denied misconduct and said he would not resign.[319][320] By the end of the month, all seven whistleblowers had left the office: three resigned, two were fired, and two were put on leave.[321]

    The allegations were made the more serious by the accusation that the affair was facilitated by friend, donor, and Austin, Texas real estate investor Nate Paul, with Paul alleged to have hired the "girlfriend" with whom Paxton was having the affair, and facilitated her move to Austin and Paxton's clandestine meetings with her, actions the managers of Paxton's failed state impeachment effort contended (see Texas House investigation and impeachment section, above) were abuses "in exchange for his office... help[ing] Paul ’s faltering businesses..., looming bankruptcies[,] and a litany of related lawsuits."[356] The impeachment managers also contended that Paxton and Paul shared an Uber account under a pseudonym to help Paxton meet with the woman.[356]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Paxton#Legal_issues

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›