the dev of Voyager has the option to do the funniest thing ever next April fools
I made the top 20! This is where I'll take a bow and go to bed. Goodnight, friends.
Woah
I’m a normie how do I search the blacklist for my username?
Here it is: https://copyparty.adrian.place/u/?doc=policy.json
Good news, any username with Gates(0-9) are banned, meaning you're not only on the list, but you're in the more exclusive part of the list.
Damn. I guess I’ll have to be more inflammatory.
you're in the more exclusive part of the list.
Wassat mean? Double secret probation?
Basically, any account on other instances with the same name are automatically banned. For example, Gates9@lemmy.blahaj.zone or Gates9@piefed.world would be banned regardless of if they currently exist. Even Gates4@lemmy.world or Gates8675309@lemmy.dbzer0.com would be banned, as any user with "Gates" followed by numbers is also included
Oh so for American non-tech people it’s like how the Republicans purge voter rolls to suppress voters.
I'm not there. My game is faltering.

First I was like "oh, guess I'm not active enough to be noticed", but there's people on the list who barely posted anything.
Guess I just didn't manage to say something that would have annoyed this person. Like talking about burger units and shit. 🤷🏻♀️ I'm just a weird anarchy hippie nerd trans girl, don't ban me. Oh crap I said it out loud
Yeah I'm super active I feel like how have I not pissed this person off!?
Should have been aggressive enough that the shitlibs are scared of you instead of holding you in the patronizing contempt they reserve for the disenfranchised.
I looked and I'm not on the list 😭 (I haven't been active enough)
Good news, they namedropped you in their explanation comment:
Both Ada and CupcakeZealot (Jessica I think?) continuously look the other way when any blahaj users call for violence. Admins can see when reports are resolved, by whom, and can check the actions in the modlog. I do not tolerate advocacy of violence in any shape or form and refuse to allow my project to be used by people who endorse that kind of behavior. Most instances at least deal with it on a superficial level, but Blahaj refuses to. This indicates, at minimum, tacit endorsement.
Lets not call that an explanation. It's a dodgy, self justifying manifesto they shat out in a reactionary meltdown.
Nah, I'm not CupcakeZealot, and I'm totally not Jessica.
Going to take the fact I'm not in the list as proof that I'm not hornyposting enough and could go further
Let me see if I get it.
Someone maakes a Lemmy client, which function is just to interact with fediverse side if lemmy, then the developers just silently blocks everything they don't like, probably because it's too woke or something like that.
Why even development a client to begin with??
Apparently they think "normies" won't come to lemmy if they have to deal with actual human variety. Users are also incapable of curating their own experience and must be coralled into the ball pit. Against their knowledge or consent.
Given their response to this controversy, they could only justify continued work on the project by "trying to foster a less toxic fediverse" or something like that. They wanted to shape the fediverse to fit their view of what it should be without the input of the users or admins.
less toxic = everyone agrees with me
I mean basically the same thing happened from the opposite side with Mastodon clients. Go on one of the phone app stores, find a mastodon client and look at older negative reviews to see if there are any about "blocking the largest mastodon instance" or something worded similarly. Several clients did it.
The reason? Gab at one point changed their backend so they were just a Mastodon instance, which made them technically the largest Mastodon instance. Several Mastodon client devs explicitly blacklisted Gab from their clients because of their far right nonsense in response.
I'm certainly not going to use Tesseract over them having a blocklist like that, but then I specifically picked the Lemmy instance I did because they only block instances in extreme cases. One instance on the blocklist, and that one only because it was entirely unmonitored and unmoderated and was being used to distribute actual CSAM (as in not drawings) as a consequence of being totally unmoderated and unmonitored.
It's actually kind of sad, because some of the features like the MBFC integration sound genuinely useful, maybe someone else will add them to a different client.
I'm honored to be on it, and surprised you aren't

I want to know if I'm on it and work 15 hours today between 2 jobs. Could someone check for me?
No, not in the copy I downloaded yesterday.
Oh no my queer as hell ass is not on the list. Perchance I have not been doing enough ACAB
you need to do more Yuri, and WholesomeYuri, 🥺 Perchance
The actual adminowner of my instance took time out of their very very busy day to present me personally with a medal for my inclusion. I shall wear it with Pride
I was in the OG blocklist as "garden-variety crackpot" https://github.com/paulo-roger/tesseract/blob/2b53f17a5506b7c4b3ad1d5c26af49662f03a478/src/lib/blacklists.ts#L2711-L2725 . Although I'd like to object to the "garden-variety" part, my crackpottery is artisanal.
Making it to the secret Tesseract blacklist may be my biggest accomplishment in life so far

Lmao he even banned this
Wait, I just learned that the original Tesseract dev, paulo-roger, left the project many years ago. Here's the reason he gave:
I'm tired of dealing with the arrogant, tone-deaf Lemmy developers and their utter disdain for moderators and anyone else working within the ecosystem. To that end, development of and support for Tesseract for Lemmy has ceased.
~~Hmm, I wonder who paulo-roger was talking about 💀💀~~
(I've mistook who paulo-roger was talking about... Thanks, TotallynotJessica!)
I'm guessing they're talking about the people developing Lemmy as a platform and not the person currently in charge of Tesseract
196
Community Rules
You must post before you leave
Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).
Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.
Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.
Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".
Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.
Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.
Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.
Avoid AI generated content.
Avoid misinformation.
Avoid incomprehensible posts.
No threats or personal attacks.
No spam.
Moderator Guidelines
Moderator Guidelines
- Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
- Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
- When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
- Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
- Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
- Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
- Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
- Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
- Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
- Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
- Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
- Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
- First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
- Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
- No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
- Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
- Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.