70
submitted 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) by Rindogang@hexbear.net to c/chat@hexbear.net

All you have to do is avoid obvious symbols and never say certain trigger words

  • “proletariat”
  • “bourgeoisie”
  • “class”
  • “means of production”

And just try to get around the words to say the exact same thing

Funny thing is, once you strip those away, most people will nod and think you’re describing reality

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 54 points 20 hours ago

This is because communists accurately describe reality

[-] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 13 points 16 hours ago

Anticommunism isn't something people ever seriously consider, it's more designed as a thought terminating cliche. Communism bad, because everyone say so. No thoughts required. Some words are communism words and therefore out a person as a bad guy commie. But they don't know what any of these words actually mean, since if they did, they wouldn't think communism is pure evil.

It relies on people knowing nothing about communism, which means that these people can also be very receptive to communist ideas, as long as you don't use the scary communism words to describe them. Almost everyone within the working class can feel the contradictions of the system, even if they can't fully articulate them.

[-] hellinkilla@hexbear.net 38 points 20 hours ago

don't use words people don't understand, use the words they do understand

[-] Biggay@hexbear.net 18 points 20 hours ago

not to be patronizing but if i think someone cant consistently understand words with more than 7 letters i totally shift my way of talking and even thinking when im around them.

[-] ClathrateG@hexbear.net 14 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

You're discounting like 40% of the population, and most of those are ignorant not stupid, blame public education and anti-intellectualism in imperialists nations

[-] Biggay@hexbear.net 3 points 13 hours ago

Literally said not to be patronizing, you should always act as the romans when in rome, you gotta blend in. I'm also a total determinist, i dont really blame anyone for anything.

[-] hellinkilla@hexbear.net 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

read the prior comment closer.. what are you disagreeing with?

[-] purpleworm@hexbear.net 12 points 18 hours ago

There are lots of words with fewer than 7 letters that you don't know and ones with more than 7 that they do, there's no need to be such a snob about it. Also illiteracy isn't just something people choose for themselves in most cases.

[-] hellinkilla@hexbear.net 5 points 19 hours ago
[-] Biggay@hexbear.net 8 points 19 hours ago

most marxist analysis uses pretty big words, somewhat unnecessarily. like working class or just workers when the academic term would be proletariat. dumbing down the language can make you fly under the radar very effectively

[-] SchillMenaker@hexbear.net 9 points 18 hours ago

I find that a lot of "Marxist analysis" is people using the big words as a smoke screen to mask a lack of deep understanding.

[-] hellinkilla@hexbear.net 6 points 17 hours ago

sometimes people have big words and understanding. they just don't know another way to talk.

there is 2 ways of education an individual:

  1. educated them to educate others

  2. educate them to exclude others

because of careerism, the second is incentivized.

[-] hellinkilla@hexbear.net 6 points 18 hours ago
[-] Biggay@hexbear.net 1 points 13 hours ago

i believe so, like here im not afraid to use big complicated words, like i remember not knowing what a mountebank is in the communist manifesto, googling it and thinking, why the fuck would you translate that as a word?

[-] hexthismess@hexbear.net 14 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

At my job, I try and translate to:

  • Proletariat = workers
  • bourgeois = bosses
  • class = working class, although I'll hold my tongue when talking to someone who describes themselves as "middle class"
  • means of production = productivity/profits

My coworkers are LIB's! (so am I, see bullet point three; but I am the one true leftist at my workplace lenin-dont-laugh )

That last bullet is tricky, but coworkers understand that they make the profitability boosts and managers crack their whips to boost productivity, while visibly monitoring other workers for slacking or stealing.

[-] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 25 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I think it was Matt in one of the chapo episodes talks about how chuds dislike capitalism but they're too dim to realize that and instead blame all of capitalism's faults onto communism.

[-] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 6 points 14 hours ago

The Alt-Right Playbook described it best, IMO. Reactionaries fundamentally believe the system itself is perfect. It relies on hierarchies, which they view not only as natural and good, but preferable. The reason problems/contradictions occur is because people step out of their "place" in the hierarchy. "They aren't following the rules," they say, while ignoring the rules are wrong.

So chuds will accurately describe a problem that occurs under capitalism, but explain it by blaming it on whatever scapegoat. It's common in their rhetoric to say how an entirely white, protestant, patriarchal, heteronormative society would function flawlessly with no crime, corruption, or misallocated resources. They view everyone else as the problem and their group(s) as ontologically correct and good.

[-] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 25 points 20 hours ago

if you ask a capitalist and a communist to criticize each other, they'll both criticize capitalism

[-] Spongebobsquarejuche@hexbear.net 9 points 18 hours ago

Yeah, and they turn to conspiracy theories.

[-] BottleBoardBakon@lemmy.ml 14 points 18 hours ago

They blame all their problems on the system that's currently oppressing them, and refuse any other economic system because it would oppress them.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 16 points 19 hours ago

I live in the very underserved rural South. Can confirm.

[-] meatcringe@hexbear.net 11 points 17 hours ago

What you call “flying under the radar” is just effective communication and meeting people where they’re at. I try not to use jargon that my conversation partners haven’t already shown familiarity with, especially when discussing social and economic issues. Even if they’re open to what you’re saying, explaining definitions or correcting misconceptions about trigger words derails the flow of the conversation and can cause them to lose interest. Of course, anytime anyone asks me how I identify politically, I just tell them I’m a socialist so I don’t actually know anything about flying under the radar, sorry 💚

[-] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 11 points 18 hours ago

I tend to avoid those when explaining my thoughts because they sound fucking weird to most people and that leads them to ignore you. Means of production is one i use cause I really dont know what else to call it that works. Also I am absolutely fine just telling people I'm a communist cause it doesn't come with any risk for me and it means I can openly represent the ideology and not have it thought of as my own half baked political idiosyncrasies. It lets people know i'm not just speaking personally.

[-] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 7 points 15 hours ago

Means of production is one i use cause I really dont know what else to call it that works.

Tools, factories, and land. Maybe throw in offices or infrastructure, but the first three get the point across. "We're the ones using these tools everyday to make stuff, why aren't I allowed to borrow it for home projects? When was the last time an actual member of the Walton family stepped foot in this Walmart, if ever?"

If you just describe things that are included in the means of production, you can avoid saying "means of production."

[-] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 5 points 18 hours ago

DL communists solidarity shahed drones flying so low

[-] Athena5898@hexbear.net 5 points 18 hours ago

Oh yeah, I do this all the time. Gotta avoid minesweeper words.

[-] BeanisBrain@hexbear.net 5 points 18 hours ago

It's like the party game Taboo

this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2026
70 points (100.0% liked)

chat

8636 readers
321 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS