273
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago

its funny that your are linking a lemmy.world cross post through piefed, but we can't view it because piefed requires login. even though the content is not from there...

[-] yggstyle@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Sure, we all get that it can be trendy to bring an old look back but... you know.

In an unrelated story:

Somone claims to have just seen Harry Caray climbing from his grave, collecting an oversized net, muttering something about one... two... three strikes... before heading towards silicon valley.

[-] notsosure@sh.itjust.works 15 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I don’t understand how these glasses will work in the EU, where filming other people is against the law.

[-] RustyNova@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

In the case of France there's two possible broken laws (not a lawyer btw):

  • If the glasses wearer upload the video/photo online, you are one of the primary subject of the frame (aka not just in he background), and didn't consent to being on the internet, you can sue.

  • Companies must legally ask you for your concent to collect personal and identifying information. If the video/photo is sent to meta for big data/ai training, they must ask for consent

Edit: "primary subject" is kinda vague and may change depending on the context. If you do a VLOG and someone does something funny in the background, not aware of the camera, and the video is re-uploaded to only feature the guy, then it becomes the primary subject, and must be asked for concent

[-] dbx12@programming.dev 15 points 5 hours ago

Just break the law and hope the other side is too poor to sue. Basically like everywhere else on the planet.

[-] notsosure@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

In data privacy cases there are ALWAYS people that will sue - there are collectives with money and lawyers.

[-] dbx12@programming.dev 3 points 2 hours ago

In general yes, but if you claim a glasshole recorded you without consent and want to sue them, it's on you to fund that legal battle. I doubt collectives are interested in individual cases.

[-] notsosure@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago

Yes, they are. They often actually need individuals to make their case, I know of several examples.

[-] communism@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 hours ago

I think no win no fee is commonplace in the EU.

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 14 points 10 hours ago

I want glasses that will "hack" into their glasses

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 9 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Meta Scanners

[-] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 22 points 12 hours ago

that crushed ear lobe lol

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 38 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I don’t normally suggest punching people because they wear glasses…. But I think an exception should be made.

They’re very punch-able glasses.

[-] LordDaveTheKind@piefed.social 9 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

”Is that a camera?"

”No"

Fake Taxi, probably...

[-] Sunshine@piefed.ca 2 points 9 hours ago

Zuckerberg moment

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2026
273 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

32231 readers
754 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS