all 39 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

1200 and 1100 goal involvement are fucking freak numbers man

  • source
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

    3 of top 4 were on a team together and they didn't even sniff a Champions League title. Strong statement on individuals not winning trophies in world football.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    That front 3 would not have won the UCL even with a bald manager of your choice with prime Milan backline and the best 3 work horse CMs of your choice + every refree decision going your way. Not in today's football anyway.

    MNM occupy same spaces when you let them loose. This is like Cancelo x Grealish problem but on steriods.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    It took me a full minute to figure out wtf you meant. “Mbappe was never in barca..? And barca won CL titles..?Huh? OOOOH YEAHHhh, PSG…”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    Idk why but harry kane is surprising.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Messi, no words. Also, shout out to R9. The man was a monster, and still a big what if story due to the knee injury.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Kylian and Haaland might well break all time goalscoring record with the number of games increasing.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Hope so, I think they will have more chances. As football is evolving, hope they create more new records for higher quality football

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    Those are some damn juicy stats holy s

  • source
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    I feel like this gets posted once a week

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    I get these are straight stastics but they should be weighed a little differently. Ronaldo should be #2 considering the insane numbers he has in each category. Fuck math and ratios and shit lol

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    I am not sure what your objection is here, normalizing per matches played is exactly the way to make this fair.

    It might be a bit better if the ratio was G+A per minute rather than per game, or removing penalties (since not all the players here were penalty-takers for all or even any of their teams).

    What would you prefer?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    r/freekarma

  • source
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    Keeping that ratio in over 1000 games is crazy

  • source
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    That's pretty close to the order in which I'd rate them.

  • source
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    I had really underestimated cristiano's assists

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    I'd argue having a lower ratio is indeed better to determine the more rounded player

  • source
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    Interesting - that’s almost my list of the most talented players of the 21st century in exact order, except Mbappe is lower and where the hell is Thierry Henry

  • source
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    Crazy to imagine that everyone bar Mbappe managed to achieve numbers like these in non-farmers leagues. Respect

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments