251
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Yliaster@lemmy.world 63 points 1 month ago

Good riddance.

Let's hope something worse doesn't show up.

[-] StillAlive@piefed.world 68 points 1 month ago

Narrator: "something worse showed up."

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] fonix232@fedia.io 44 points 1 month ago

Fookin hell mate, I leave for a few days and all hell gets loose?

Let's hope the next PM is less of an undercooked potato than Starmer was.

[-] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 42 points 1 month ago

When was the last time there was a good one? In my lifetime there's been Thatcher, Major, Blair, Brown, Cameron, May, Johnson, Truss, Sunak and Starmer. Name one good one amongst that rogues gallery. I will not hold my breath.

[-] Mertn33@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

Truss, She was fantastic. For a week or two. Crashed the pound and made it cheaper to send my UK daughter some birthday money.

[-] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 10 points 1 month ago

Truss, She was fantastic. For a week or two

No, you are thinking of the cabbage!

[-] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

God, choosing a least bad one is even hard. ~~David Cameron or~~ Gordon Brown? I don’t know if I was just less informed about British politics during their tenures or if they were actually better.

Edit: oof, I forgot about how Cameron handled brexit, not him.

[-] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 14 points 1 month ago

Probably Gordon Brown or John Major.

[-] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 15 points 1 month ago

Brown sold off the gold reserve when gold was at a record low. He tried to increase pre-charge detention to 42 days and to introduce lie detectors into benefits claims.

[-] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 15 points 1 month ago

Never claimed he was perfect. You can find fault with literally every PM that has ever existed. But him and Major seemed to be relatively scandal free compared to many who have come before and after them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 month ago

Cameron brought us get the unemployed to work unpaid for private corporations to keep their unemployment benefits.

If you want to argue that is technically paid work you can buy then it was paid at £1.60/hour, far below minimum wage and the tax payer was paying it rather than the corporation benefiting from it.

[-] Mertn33@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Slavery runs strong in British history

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 5 points 1 month ago

Brown probably, but he didn't have much time to screw anything up.

[-] tenebrisnox@feddit.uk 10 points 1 month ago

Brown is frequently cited by economists as the person who did most to repair the world economy after 2008 and prevent the collapse from being catastrophic.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz 12 points 1 month ago
[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I would like to believe that this is causal not correlative. You leaving caused this to happen. You are too powerful.

[-] fonix232@fedia.io 5 points 1 month ago

I've got an idea!

I will start a holiday fund. Whenever y'all want a new PM, just donate enough so I can head off for a week or two. With a country of 60 million people... If just half of you want a new PM, a single one penny donation will make it happen.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] FishFace@piefed.social 26 points 1 month ago

Can't wait for the media to work their magic on Burnham until he too is universally reviled. It already seems to have started.

[-] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago

It wasn't the media's fault that Burnham basically up and said "I agree with everything Labour has done under Starmer".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 month ago

You okay Britain? You've been going through PMs like DiCaprio goes through 20 year olds.

[-] Tweak@feddit.uk 10 points 1 month ago

Murdoch says we need a new PM so...

[-] Ougie@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

If only more countries did the same

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 month ago

Fucking finally.

Now lets see how much worse the next one is...

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 12 points 1 month ago

Maybe I've not been playing close enough attention to politics, but I'm not entirely sure what he's done so wrong to warrant this. He's very middle of the road, hardly wowing everyone, but hardly very scandalous either (well, apart from appointing Mandelson I guess). Is this now just going to become the norm, changing PM's every year?

[-] Zombie@feddit.uk 52 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Under his tenure:

  • terrorism laws have been exploited to criminalise property damage and the holding of signs by pensioners
  • the nation's medical records have been sold off to the known foreign fascist controlled private company Palantir
  • our freedoms on the internet have been curtailed
  • he appointed a known friend of a paedophile and twice previously disgraced minister as US ambassador despite vetting saying not to
  • austerity has continued
  • the broken workfare (not welfare) system has continued
  • the UK has continued to supply weapons and intelligence to a genocidal state
  • trial by jury is looking likely to be abolished
  • private water is still a fucking disgrace with little done to remedy it

He's a wet blanket who's incapable of commanding a cabinet, and spends more time making stupid TikToks like he's on the campaign trail than doing anything of substance. His actions, cabinet, and command of that cabinet, contradict everything he says he stands for.

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] FishFace@piefed.social 11 points 1 month ago

Absolutely nothing. He's not been amazing by any stretch, but his net approval rating is -46, beating Liz Truss at the height of her unpopularity by a mere 1 percentage point. Liz Truss crashed the economy and the entire country knew it, while Starmer has... U-turned on a few things. Generally been a bit milquetoast. Speaks with a nasal voice?

image

His unpopularity is deeper than Boris Johnson, who was swilling wine with his mates while the rest of us were enjoying the delights of yet another quiz on Zoom, who illegally prorogued parliament to deliberately impede the democratic operation of parliament, ever reached.

And the same will happen to Burnham, and in two years we'll be going into another general election with the least popular PM ever and the Labour party will again be tearing itself to shreds, and hand the country over to Reform or whatever even more nakedly racist self-consciously obnoxious bile has emerged out of the right wing.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] thehatfox@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

The majority of the public is desperate for change, and running out of patience with a political system that doesn't deliver.

Starmer ran on a vague platform of change and competence, but since taking office Starmer has shown have little political vision or political acumen to move the country forward. The Labour government has been less beset by personal scandal, but the bar for that was already incredibly low.

[-] Yliaster@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Fascist, anti-trans, surveillance kinda sums it up nicely.

[-] Mertn33@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Yeah. Banning vpns or at least requiring ID for them, because he messed up so badly banning social media.

[-] MartianSands@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

There hasn't been any specific event which has cost him his position (at least, not known to the general public). His problem is that there's basically nobody who likes him, and the only reason he got selected in the first place is that nobody particularly hated him either. Now new parties have sprung up to fill the void left by what were traditionally the majority parties, so "he's not the other guy" isn't going to swing it any more.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] PodPerson@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago

How many Truss's did Starmer last?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Skua@kbin.earth 10 points 1 month ago

Well I respect that he's had the grace to not make it messy

[-] AbsolutelyNotSpez@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

What are you talking about? It's been messy for ages by now.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 9 points 1 month ago

Comes in, shits on table, leaves

[-] Sunshine@piefed.ca 9 points 1 month ago

After burning down the UK, he gets to enjoy his golden parachute how lovely!

[-] TWeaK@lemmy.today 9 points 1 month ago

"Burning down the UK" like introducing a massive renter's rights bill?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

To be fair, Conservatives started the fire more than a decade earlier. Starmer just failed to meet expectations, sometimes in egregious ways.

[-] tenebrisnox@feddit.uk 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The long-running London production of "The Government" is about to announce its new lead. Don't worry, everything about the show is the same and you'll still be able to buy refreshments during the interval - though the Cost of Living Crisis means prices for beers, wine and choc-ices have to be increased by 50%. "The Government" became a hit when it promised change to the usual Westminster shows but, over the last 50 years has declined in popularity.

"Pure knockabout theatre," is how one critic has described the show while Muddy Wokenfield of The Guardian called it "Vaudeville and Pantomime at it's British best!"

[-] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Was he saying he's a leftist but acting like a rightist, or a rightist who was always going to be so?

There's only really those two types left in Labour globally.

[-] MartianSands@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago

He presented himself as a moderate, which in reality means he wanted to pull the labor party back to the right again. The very first thing he did was purge the left wing of the party

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Epstein pedophile handing contracts to pedo Peter Thiel’s palantir

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

Cannot wait for trump to take credit for this.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2026
251 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

5608 readers
67 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS