all 41 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

News at 8, water is wet

  • source
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (13 children)

    You know what… I have not once thought.

    “I wish my M1 was faster”

  • source
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

    Your 2-3 year old computer? Is it expected such a new computer would feel slow?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    In the dark days of the past, a 2 to 3 year old computer would be horribly outdated.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    Seeing these M3 deals and it makes me wanna upgrade, but then I remember "oh wait, the M1 Pro is still an upgrade, I've never needed more than my M1 MBA, I just need the bigger nicer screen and M1 Pros are cheaper than ever." They really just are good enough for almost anyone...if they drop OLED screens I can see upgrading again for that, but in terms of power M1 still feels like enough. I play WoW/LoL, I don't build classical symphonies in Logic, I don't edit Transformers 8 in FCPX...M1 still a beefy machine for the rest of us.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

    It would be surprising if any other CPU were faster. The M3 Max gets about 20,000 points in Geekbench 6, and the current fastest processor (the Intel i9-13980HX) gets what, 18,000 for 55 watts base TDP and 157 watts turbo TDP?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Context makes that comparison not surprising either, and also less impressive.

    The 13980hx is Intel 10nm, now called Intel 7, which is comparable to TSMC 7nm. The M3 is on TSMC N3B.

    Even the base M3 uses more transistors than the 13980hx. The M3 Max has more transistors than a 4090.

    So it's essentially Apple buying their way to have a very good CPU. A similar chip is doable by Intel and AMD, but they have to build chips that partners want to buy, and the industry isn't eager to have $1000+ SoCs that need to go into $3000 laptops, consumer demand for that is low.

    And mind you while the 13980hx is Intels highest performing mobile CPU, it's not actually a mobile CPU, it's a desktop CPU binned and power limited for mobile use. It's a half ass take. After next year they will likely dump this approach as they are fundamentally changing their lineup.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    Well that's very naive way of thinking. Intel is simply not able to compete. Not even with AMD. If you believe they have some magical, efficiency CPU next year you are out of touch. Intel is history

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    Only if it came with lpddr5x

  • source
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    The only issue I really have with my M2 Max isn't performance, but it turning into a furnace and burning a hole through my desk when I try to push it. Sadly I think that's just how all laptops are these days

    My laptop struggles ever so slightly at full throttle, but I think I can handle this machine for the next 5 years minimum

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Disappointed that the display still has slow response times. I wonder why it got worse than the M2 series models.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    It's already somewhat noticeable on my current MBP (M1P), I can't imagine nearly doubling the response time and not noticing...

    Visually it's a good looking display, but I'd think pulling down the response times and improving blooming would have been a priority.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    My only issue with MBPs these days are the damn notch that doesn't even sport Face ID to unlock. A legacy USB-A port would still be dandy too tbh.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    I’m guessing the earliest they’ll bring over Face ID is when they redesign the Pros. Luckily I don’t notice the notch much after using it. It disappears for me just like it did on iPhones.

    Touch ID on MacBooks does make sense because of the built-in keyboard. The current way Apple implements Face ID still requires an additional user action. When you unlock your iPhone with Face ID you still need to swipe up to enter the Home Screen.

    If Apple brings Face ID to MacBooks I’m guessing they’ll implement something similar like a swipe up on the trackpad or key press.

    I don’t think they do the auto-login like Windows Hello.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    I’m guessing the earliest they’ll bring over Face ID is when they redesign the Pros. Luckily I don’t notice the notch much after using it. It disappears for me just like it did on iPhones.

    Touch ID on MacBooks does make sense because of the built-in keyboard. The current way Apple implements Face ID still requires an additional user action. When you unlock your iPhone with Face ID you still need to swipe up to enter the Home Screen.

    If Apple brings Face ID to MacBooks I’m guessing they’ll implement something similar like a swipe up on the trackpad or key press.

    I don’t think they do the auto-login like Windows Hello.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    Already looking forward to the next hardware cycle in my company. Then I can use the fastest CPU in a 14-inch laptop to write mails and connect to a remote server for work.

  • source
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    Pixel response time is 80.8 ms which is 10x too slow for 120Hz refresh rate

    99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (34.3 ms)

    The worst part is that the M2 Pro MacBook Pro had a pixel response time of 35.2 ms... which means Apple made the pixel response beyond 2x worse. I don't get why things are getting worse.

  • source
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    Damn, starts at 3200 USD.

  • source
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago
    [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    80 ms grey to grey response time? What the fuck?! How are people praising this display everywhere? That puts it close to unusable. It's 5 frames at 60Hz...

  • source