As Meta races to recenter itself around artificial intelligence, the tech giant is mandating that more than 7,000 workers must move to new teams, and it’s radically changing some employees’ jobs. The Guardian has also learned that some of these reassigned employees will shift to two new teams: one building AI cloud infrastructure and another that’s building an internal AI agent codenamed Hatch.

Late last week, Meta employees received a notice that engineers had been “selected” for reassignment and would begin reporting to the cloud infrastructure and Hatch teams by the end of this week. Meta made a similar move last month when it reshuffled at least 1,000 engineers on to a new data labeling team called Applied AI, or AAI – at first giving them the option to volunteer, but later telling workers: “Transfers aren’t optional.”

“Our work, infrastructure and our products are fundamentally changing as a result of the continued acceleration of AI,” wrote Peter Hoose, vice-president of production engineering at Meta, in an internal post about the two new teams viewed by the Guardian. “The pace of what we are building is unprecedented, and these are exactly the kind of challenges that define what we do best.”

A Meta employee referenced last month’s reshuffle in a comment on Hoose’s announcement, writing: “Does ‘selected’ imply this is an [Applied AI]-style draft rather than a voluntary move?”

Further proof the Meta doesn't know what the Zuck it's doing. The rebrand has gone swimmingly, given all the time we spend in the legless metaverse.

all 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 23 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Thank goodness. Meta can't collapse on itself quickly enough. Hopefully some of those engineers will be distracted from crafting spyware, for awhile.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

    Last I looked


    not recently


    Facebook was one of the more-competitive Bay Area tech companies in terms of base salary (though there are places where people can do better in terms of equity compensation), so they probably have some leeway to ask their employees to do stuff.

    searches

    https://www.businessinsider.com/meta-salaries-revealed-how-much-engineers-researchers-made-in-2025-2026-4?op=1

    This is only part of a larger list linked to above, but for 2025 engineering salaries only, base salary only, stock options and other forms of compensation excluded:

    ASIC & FPGA Engineer: $299,880

    ASIC Manager, Design Verification: $258,940.00 to $299,880

    Director, Production Engineering: $354,123

    Embedded Software Engineer: $169,313 to $269,081

    Front End Engineer: $178,000 to $282,461

    Production Engineer: $108,098 to $317,242

    Production Engineering Manager: $258,524 to $309,797

    Senior Staff Software Engineer: $311,029

    Software Engineer: $124,000 to $450,000

    Software Engineer (Leadership) - Infrastructure: $317,797

    Software Engineering Manager: $200,907 to $328,000

    Software Engineer Manager: $277,837 to $318,000

    Sr Staff Hardware Engineer: $294,520

    Staff Software Engineer: $258,524 to $263,803

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago*

    Yes. I would imagine gathering data to sell to Epstein's customers to guide their kidnappers could pay rather nicely, whether or not Meta staff realize the data they collect and sell could be used that way.

    And I suppose AI adds heaps of deniability, which could be helpful whenever Meta's best customers end up in court...for whatever reason.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    “The pace of what we are building is unprecedented, and these are exactly the kind of challenges that define what we do best.”

    What is it that you do best though? What do you sell?

    Moving 1000 engineers to a “data labeling team” and calling it applied AI basically seems like demoting 1000 engineers to non-engineering roles, I’d be insulted but people working for Meta in 2026 probably don’t have a lot of pride to lose. Seems like most AI companies outsource the labelling stuff so I wonder how Meta is justifying paying people engineering salaries to do it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    There are ways to label data that aren't just humans selecting from a word list. The quality of that labeling is then dependent on the quality of the process you use to create it, but that can be good enough that it has value. Sometimes it's just starting from a known good/easy label and tracking the thing it's attached to forward or backward in a video.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago

    I was recently reminded that the advances at PARC and Bell Labs weren’t directed from the top down - they were simply smart people given the job of “build something neat”.

    Top down, forceful R&D is probably not going to be terrifically successful.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago

    I hope zuck gets sucked into a turbine engine

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago

    Totally misread that as "Transfems" aren't optional. I always thought transfems were more into cybersecurity anyway.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    The yahoo of our time.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago*
    [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Well, what else would those engineers work on? Most of Meta's product lines are either stable or dead. If they weren't going to AI, they would just be going away.

  • source