They are an active participant, taking pleasure in it. This prosecution, and what it has shown of their character, being so full of hate for those protesting genocide, had given lie to the labour party's bullshit.

Always has been.

Ghislane and Epstein worked there extensively. Andrew was just the dumb crown jewel

A bunch of the Labour top team are in the "Labour Friends of Israel" group. Starmer is in it, Streeting is in it. As is anybody else with a chance, because anyone else is in the "antisemite" group, and not allowed to do anything.

Don't expect this to change. Farage or the Tories wouldn't change it either.

Us and the septics set Israel up. It's our little project, and we can't do much apart from voting Green (who are now also smeared as antisemites and run by fundamentalist Muslims, despite being run by a gay Jew). Even then the US would prop them up forever. As long as oil is a thing, they need Israel to project power on the Middle East.

The UK has historically always been the villain

You're right about the substance, but are you saying that most of the EU, Canada, Australia, New zealand are not civilized?

The king should intervene

Ok, I won't.

The fact that that is an option for the judge is insane. That a judge can just be like, "I literally don't give a shit about this topic. In fact it's illegal for you to mention it, regardless of the relevance."

Indeed. judge "Justice Johnson" is the one doing all these wildly draconian moves to get Palestine Action convicted as terrorists. His name is straight out of a comic book

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckgp5k0ex1zo

I mean they already doing this to themselves. Nothing but Ls since Brexit. If it wasn't for London's grip on elite marketplaces the country would be collapsing already.

It's the UK lol, it's never been for those things

Depends how far the rot goes.

This has to have been a politically motivated act. Influence occurring behind the scenes. What if that extends to appeals or the high court?

This is the UK

Half of the UK parliament is chosen by the monarch.

No.

The other half is chosen through the problematic and undemocratic first past the post voting system.

Yes.

UK streets have CCTV everywhere.

It's not the CCTV you want to worry about. The CCTV is overwritten regularly and typically goes nowhere. It's the internet-connected stuff you wanted to worry about, and the blanket surveillance by Google and meta. Carrying a smartphone and worrying about CCTV while you post pictures of yourself where LLMs can scrape them is utterly irrational.

It’s time for people to admit to themselves that the UK, especially England, is a dictatorship.

No, just a half-police state. But at least you tend not to get murdered by the police for being black in charge of a vehicle in the UK, and the healthcare is free.

This, though, this is AWFUL and they went OUT OF THEIR WAY to deny these people justice. If you deny the defendants the right to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, you have denied them justice.

What balls?

So many people can’t even change their shopping habits to make more ethical choices. There’s no way a sizeable population is going to forego passing on their DNA just to send a message.

As a teen, I figured I’d adopt kids when I got older. The amount of people who were dead-set on “b-b-but my genetic lineage!” was startling. As I’ve aged through my 20s and now my 30s, I’ve seen them stick true to their word and have their own babies, even with the world circling down the drain. The biological call to reproduce seems to override a lot of other matters.

Now consider how hard it is to get people to quit something without a biological imperative, like shopping on Amazon…

Anyway, I admire your initiative. I just can’t imagine people participating en masse in a protest that involves forfeiting something so dear and intimate to them as their choice to reproduce.

Too long a time lag to achieve anything.

You're just a right wing psy op to repress the birth of future left leaning voters! /s (I got inspired by recent comments I've seen)

But it's an interesting idea that could royally screw with a country if followed through. But I think it has abysmal chances of actually happening. Choosing to not have kids when a couple is both willing and able is an incredibly large sacrifice to those that want kids. And you wouldn't see if such a strike worked until 9 months later (or a not earlier since there wouldn't be as many pregnancy scans).