top 35 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 87 points 3 years ago (2 children)

So basically, Reddit wants you to work for free, to moderate content provided to them for free by users and if you don't do it the specific way they want you to they'll kick you?

sounds like a recipe for success

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    This level of editorial influence sounds to me like Reddit is becoming more of a media publisher/editor instead of just a platform, which would (should) remove their protection from defamation & other law suits based on content published on the site…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    this is a good take and probably an indicator of the direction the investors have been pushing reddit into

    Which is all negated by the fact that reddit only exists because the user base creates and curates the content that other users want.

    When that dynamic is removed reddit will just be another deflating has-been media site.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 61 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    It's funny how Reddit rarely if ever has stepped in to reign in actual problematic mods in the past, instead just encouraging people to create their own subreddit if they don't like how it's being run.

    But now, they suddenly change their tune, and spout this sentimental blather about how mods are "stewards" and "in a position of trust", and now they will solemnly respond with "next steps" if mods don't open these important communities. Their arguments are totally incoherent.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 3 years ago

    Amen to that.

    'We DGAF if the mods are abusing the community that's only there because it has a good name. As long as the clicks keep happening, it's all good. But the second they cause US a problem, we'll squash them'.

    I don't think Reddit has done one single thing in the last week that doesn't reek of 'we don't care about our users'.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child)

    Responding with "next steps"? So it's, what, about two more warnings from reddit h.r. before moderators are presented with a Performance Improvement Plan?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    unpaid volunteer moderators

    Performance Improvement Plan

    Given all the rubbish that Reddit is doing right now, I wouldn't be surprised if they just got more brazen with it

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    It’s funny how Reddit rarely if ever has stepped in to reign in actual problematic mods in the past, instead just encouraging people to create their own subreddit if they don’t like how it’s being run.

    Because more subs and more workers mods means more content and more money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    I wonder if mods in some more enlightened countries could start to sue Reddit for being hidden workers and not getting employment rights and minimum wage. Some places have done that sucessfully for Uber and deliveroo etc with them losing their claim they are just a notice board for self contractors, companies lost due to the fact they set so mamy rules that driver had to follow.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 52 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Crazy to think Reddit subs used to be a built by the people, for the people, with the ones who created it governing decisions. And here we are with the head honchos saying "Nah, we're just gonna take the reigns now". Shame.

    Fantastic reply btw lmfao.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 3 years ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 17 points 3 years ago

    We never needed big tech. Today we need it even less.

    I'm excited to see what we build.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Been on Lemmy for like 20 minutes.. seems legit. Really hope it takes off!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    But guys they have a DUTY.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Right, DUTY to provide free labor for prospective shareholde... err, users, we mean users! Yes, duty to users, that sounds good and inoffensive and like we actually care about our human cattle... I mean, valuable users, there's that slip of the tongue again...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago
    [–] 9 points 3 years ago

    Cheers to being on the right side of history (I hope). Someone has to have standards.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago*

    "sent from sync on android "

    The cherry on top lol

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    Onward and upward lads

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    Oh well. Fuck Spez. <3

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    Hmm being one of the mods of a. minor sub (only 640 subscribers) I also got the threat message and considered what to do.

    I opened the sub up again, and (as it's a quite unimportant sub) will probably try to be the worst mod possible, to make that sub as unattractive as possible.

    I still have a GDPR information request running - and will probably also send a deletion request. (But I want a list of all my posts and comments first to be able to validate they don't show up again, over the next years)

    So, until my account is deleted I'll try to let the sub rot and decay.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    Couldn't have said it better myself.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [+] 1 point 3 years ago
    load more comments
    view more: next ›