44
submitted 3 weeks ago by bayaz@fedia.io to c/askscience@lemmy.world

I was inspired by today's XKCD text: "Scientists occasionally invent alternative periodic table layouts, which is usually a sign that they don't have enough enrichment in their enclosures." (emphasis mine)

If we spend nearly all of our time alone, what kinds of "enrichment" do we need to keep ourselves from going crazy?

I assume ethical research here would be difficult to find, but it seems like there could be observational studies of prisoners, scientists at isolated outposts, etc. I wonder how many work-from-home people are keeping themselves in conditions that would be considered unethical if those conditions were forced on them.

(I'm not doing as badly as this post would imply -- it's just a slow Friday here :) )

EDIT: People seem to be really fixating on the prison thing. It was an example of a place where people can feel isolation and still be monitored. I am aware that my home is not a prison.

I work from home. I like working from home. Sometimes I get lonely or bored, and I wondered what science said I should do to ensure I'm having the best experience possible.

@LurkingLuddite@piefed.social nailed the intent of my question. It was meant to ask about research-backed positive things that people should ensure they are doing.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 14 points 3 weeks ago

Nice try, corporate manager

[-] LikePravana@piefed.social 5 points 3 weeks ago

These studies only reflect the effects of adverse conditions on mental health. If the person in question considers remote work to be the same as being in prison or something similar, the problem is with the person, not remote work.

[-] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

They're asking for studies in general. There are ABSOLUTELY more studies than "adverse" studies. There are plenty of exploratory studies from old psych and space travel studies about isolation from basically all decades since the space race. Besides, isolation is unquestionably an 'adverse' condition for even extreme introverts at a certain point. A point that is reachable for a reclusive WFH type.

Besides general studies, there have also been many across the world thanks to covid lockdowns. Not just observations, but actual studies on what happened.

Of course WFH isn't inherently bad. That's not what they're implying or asking about. They're asking for data on what has been shown to be concerning or difficult, not opinions on what those things might be.

In fact, they're almost asking the opposite: What enrichment do most humans end up needing more of in such situations vs only asking what makes the situation tough.

It's the difference between asking, "what does a healthy diet look like?" vs, "what does mcdonnalds do to your body?"

[-] bayaz@fedia.io 1 points 3 weeks ago

Thanks for this! You understood the intent of my question perfectly. I was expecting this thread to be a lot more fun and full of interesting, research-supported tips and guidelines. Apparently, people thought I meant my question a different way.

[-] irotsoma@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

I don't consider my home anything like prison. I'm not isolated. I just don't have to be in person with work people. Has no effect on my social life. And actually I get more work done because I'm not constantly interrupted. It's no different than before cubicles and open office plans when people could close their office door. Remote work is absolutely nothing like isolation or even close to the lack of freedom and constant danger that makes prison so horrible.

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 3 weeks ago

I don't see why people would keep themselves like that. I regularly speak with neighbors and walk my dog and go to parks and you know shopping and such. Non of that comes close to isolated scientists or prisoners. Im no more isolated when I work from home than working in an office. I mean I guess there is the commute but its not like I talk with people on the busses or trains all that often. Although it does happen on occasion.

this post was submitted on 08 May 2026
44 points (94.0% liked)

Ask Science

16745 readers
94 users here now

Ask a science question, get a science answer.


Community Rules


Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.


Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.


Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.


Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.


Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.


Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.


Rule 7: Report violations.Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.


Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.


Rule 9: Source required for answers.Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.


By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.

We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS