top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 79 points 4 months ago (4 children)

It's funny to have been on the front end of the rapid consolidation of devices only to see the tail end of it when we distribute them again.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    I mean it's definitely pretty phenomenal. I actually still have an 80 gig iPod from back in the day. It is a superior music player.

    But I just can't see myself carrying that around and my phone. Nowadays, most of the music that I listen to is Pandora or YouTube music.

    I have a mp3 collection on my phone but it's very curated.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 4 months ago* (8 children)

    I also have one of those. Really nice, premium-feeling hardware and great sound quality, as expected from Fiio. They really should have added some additional buttons though. Forward/back, menu navigation and volume control all using the same 2 buttons is quite annoying. The software is also rather clunky and basic, comparable to the average mid-2000s "nugget" - I guess that might make it even more nostalgic for some. In any case, it's cool having my own dedicated device for music I own again. Right now, it's a solid 7/10 device for me, but could easily become an 8 or 9 with better software.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I've tried enough custom os players to know that they are never good. Ofren you cant do something as simple as play a random album, search by name, or go to the currently playing album/artist.

    I prefer android, so I can install any player.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 4 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Agree with all your points!

    The metal body is so very satisfying. But the cheaper (and almost toy-like) Innioasis Y1 had a far better menu system with that scroll-wheel

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    I have a teeny tiny 2015 smartphone with a headphone jack, an SD card, the SIM removed, and a copy of Foobar2000 installed. It was never fast enough or capacious enough to be a very good portable internet portal, but it runs something simple like Foobar2000 very, very well. The battery still lasts longer than the one in my actual phone does. And it was (in a sense) free. Reduce Reuse Recycle.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    People here are complaining about another device to carry around, android phones not having enough storage, streaming being better etc.

    There are programs and apps to stream your own. I have a nas (network attached storage) where I keep my music. It came with a music player and a mobile app out of the box that can stream and cast my collection. Plex can also do it quite easily. I'm sure there are others too.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    Plexamp is just wonderful, even if the Plex music library management is slightly lacking. Before I moved my music to a Plex server on my NAS I used DoubleTwist's Cloud Player and streamed my own music out of my Google Drive storage. This was 10 years ago, but it did the job well enough. However Plex made all my music available all the time directly on my phone. No moving of files to cloud storage necessary. Easy switch.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 4 months ago

    ... There’s something about having a fixed library, one that I’ve put together myself, that makes listening feel more deliberate in a way that streaming never really did....

    Yes there is. Welcome to the 20th century.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago

    Quite the ad. There are a ton of devices with similar specs just like this on the market. The price is good so if you like the design and want an off-network device this will do fine.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (20 children)

    What's the benefit of this device when you can just put your audio files directly on your phone or laptop already?

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

    My phone is a distraction machine. Having dedicated devices allows me to focus better.

    It's smaller than a phone.

    It has a long battery life.

    It's a proper high-res audio device. Much better audio quality than what you can get with bluetooth, a built-in headphone jack or most dongles. Even has a balanced output.

    And finally, it's just more fun.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago (11 children)

    Most phones dont have enough storage for a medium sized music collection. Most phones dont have a headphone jack.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago (7 children)

    I would argue both points.

    First, most phones have at least 20GB, which is a LOT of music storage if you're using 320vbr compression, and if you're an audiophile who absolutely positively must have flac for everything, you're already going to be familiar enough with storage to know what size microSD card to get. Add in a synced dropbox/gdrive/nextcloud/whatever folder, and you don't even have to manually plug it in to transfer files anymore, so space is kind if irrelevant.

    Second, most people who are mobile are going to be listening with bluetooth headphones, and those who aren't can still use a USB-C to jack adapter, which are pretty inexpensive and ubiquitous now, have passthrough charging solved, etc. For the audiophiles, there are very good USB-C DACs out now.

    I guess I'm just confused about where this device fits into my life. If I'm mobile, it's extra stuff to carry that duplicates functions I already have on me. If I'm home, I have fixed audio equipment that is way more versatile.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    All Android phones support Opus which makes it a great format if storage space is limited, as it's optimized for low bitrates. You can go as low as 64 kbps if you are not picky. 128 kbps is near transparent and certainly enjoyable, while 192 kbps is basically a 320 kbps mp3 equivalent.

    At 128 kbps, one can store 5000 songs even if they have just 20 GB to spare, as mentioned above.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    Most phones dont have enough storage

    And neither does this thing. 8GB is absolutely laughable and then it can't even handle SD cards above 256 GB? That's considerably worse than my cheap, 6 year old phone (64GB internal storage, supports up to 512 GB SD cards and has a headphone jack).

    This thing would have to be really cheap, like < $50 cheap to be worthwhile.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 6 points 4 months ago

    i alwaya have 512GB android phones and happy with my MP3 collection, and a few movies thats all I've done for the last few pones sans SD card. There are still a few adnroid phones with an SD slot. My Nokia XR 20 has an SD slot and a headphone jack. I use it as a backup phone on my bike though with a Quad lock

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

    I have an Echo Mini, and I have come to really enjoy using it, both as a DAP and a usb DAC. I will say, the software isn't great. For example, whenever I add new files to the SD card, "favorites" are just wiped out, rendering the feature basically useless. Sorting is weirdly inconsistent. These are things that could be fixed with firmware updates,

    I don't get why the firmware is closed source. Don't they have much more to gain by opening it and allowing enthusiasts to help improve it? What is the benefit of keeping the source secret?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    I both love and hate mine. The fundamental sound quality, size, weight and aesthetic is great. And I love an interface that means album artwork doesn’t matter.

    Being a universal USB C DAC is great.

    But the software quality control is horrendous. Every update introduces a new bug, you can’t update without wiping all your settings, and some albums won’t show the tracks in the right order no matter what I try.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago

    Jealous you got the metal one. I bought the earlier plastic version. They're supposedly making a Echo Nano version too

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    I was alone, falling free, trying my best not to forget

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Nice! I've been eyeing these for awhile. This was a great read and has me convinced to get one.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    It's not bad but they are usually useless unless you have high quality music, even then you need some quality headphones or IEMs to make proper use of it. I'm not against it but software usually sucks and updates are really rare, until then I'm not sure I can buy another one.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›