518
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by Deep@mander.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world

EU rules on common chargers apply to laptops from today. It means that all new laptops sold in the European Union must now support USB-C charging.

In December 2024, the rules came into force for mobile phones, tablets, digital cameras, headphones, videogame consoles, and portable speakers.

Laptop manufacturers were given a longer lead in time to allow for redesign and transition to the common charging system.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 hours ago

So the shape of the plug is the same for all devices regardless of the spec... doesn't it just make things more confusing for non techies? I can already see people saying their new laptop is broken because their 5v 0.67A power brick won't charge it, or buying a USB-c charger just to find out it doesn't work. A lot of aftermarket chargers claim to support up to 120W etc. Except they mean 120W is a sum of all ports for a 5 port charger so really it's only 20W. For techies it can get annoying too if you like to play with hardware. You can just feed appropriate voltage DC over those barrel connectors, for example from a car battery with a buck converter or AA/18650 in series and it will work while usb-c charging needs to be negotiated.

[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago
[-] weaponG@lemmy.world 39 points 20 hours ago

Putting "Universal" back in "USB"

[-] Dicska@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

I bet it's not available on Jupiter.

[-] Tattorack@lemmy.world 1 points 17 minutes ago

Let's change that.

[-] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

and it'll take a few million years for Andromeda to get the news

[-] parson0@startrek.website 139 points 1 day ago

I just love the EU. Not perfect of course, but this kind of stuff is great.

[-] themurphy@lemmy.ml 95 points 1 day ago

Nothing is perfect, but the EU is by far the best government entity for consumers right now.

[-] myrmidex@belgae.social 53 points 23 hours ago

the best

Low bar though. I'll not forget Chat Control. Dieselgate, Qatargate, or Ursula's unelectedness.

[-] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 20 points 21 hours ago

“Unelected Ursula” is directly from the Russian disinformation playbook btw.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] encelado748@feddit.org 10 points 18 hours ago

How is dieselgate the fault of the EU? The main offender was Volkswagen. Chat Control and Qatargate are the result of lobbying and corruption, and while the EU is not immune to this kind of influences (being a government body made by people), the aggregate result of EU bureaucracy is much better then any other power block currently active in the world in my opinion.

[-] myrmidex@belgae.social 3 points 17 hours ago

In June 2016, documents leaked to the press indicated that in 2010, European Commission officials had been warned by their in-house science team that at least one car manufacturer was possibly using a NOx-related defeat device in order to bypass emission regulation.

[-] encelado748@feddit.org 5 points 16 hours ago

While this is totally true, you cannot fault the EU for not acting on the in-house science team info given the EU commission had no authority on policing car manufacturers. At the time that was the duty of national authorities. Now the EU commission has granted itself the power to conduct vehicle audits and fine those responsible. Positives changes over embarrassing scandals are a positive outcome to me, and not the norm in modern politics.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] themurphy@lemmy.ml 21 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Chat Control was still a proposal made by a few politicians in a big continent. Never an EU made innitiative of any kind, and never voted through.

And I think you should read about the democratic system in the EU, if you want to challenge how she was elected.

She's elected how most of European countries elect their presidents. You vote for parties, and then after; one among them will be president. Typically the head figure from the biggest party.

We should be very glad it's not an election like in the US. Awful way of giving "power" to the people, by putting a single person in charge by popular vote.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

The source of law here is Directive 2022/2380 (which amends Directive 2014/53), in Article 2 a grace period until 2026-04-28 is defined for the category of laptops. This has now expired, which explains the renewed wave of articles being published.

The directive itself is not that interesting to read, as a lot of it is just empowering the Commission to make a decision on the specifics. The result is in the Commission Delegated Regulation 2023/1717. Although it seems to me like something is missing. I can't find more though.

A very interesting Q&A from their Commission Notice – Guidance document:

  1. Are laptops and other radio equipment that require more than 240 W of charging power exempted from the ‘common charger’ rules?

No. They are not exempted. Radio equipment which is subject to the ‘common charger’ rules must incorporate the harmonised charging solution.

The Commission has updated (in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/1717), the references to the standards cited in Annex Ia to the latest version of the European standards. Therefore, due to the amendments introduced by this delegated regulation, radio equipment subject to the ‘common charger’ rules must incorporate the harmonised charging solution up to their maximum charging power or up to 240W if their maximum charging power is above 240W (as opposed to 100W in the previous versions of the standards concerned).

The Commission will continue to update the technical specifications set out in Annex Ia, in order to reflect scientific and technological progress or market developments provided that such developments meet the objectives of the common charging solution.

But then also

  1. Are proprietary charging receptacles allowed in addition to a USB-C receptacle?

Yes. The RED only requires radio equipment subject to the ‘common charger’ rules to be equipped with the USB-C receptacle. The use of other receptacles is therefore not prohibited as long as the covered radio equipment is also equipped with a harmonised charging (USB-C) receptacle.

That means those hefty laptops going up to 350 W or whatever, now need to accept 240 W over USB PD, but they may still include additional proprietary charging solutions that are rated higher.

Also I don't think the 100 W limit that some outlets report is actually in force since 2023/1717 has replaced the references to ‘EN IEC 62680-1-3:2021’ by those to ‘EN IEC 62680-1-3:2022’

Reading on, yes they make that explicit further down:

  1. Is a radio equipment allowed to charge above 240 W when using an additional charging protocol?

Yes. If the radio equipment proprietary charging solution requires more than 240 W (e.g. 300 W), the concerned radio equipment must also support USB PD up to 240W.

The Commission has updated, via Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/1717, the references to the standards cited in Annex Ia to the latest version of the European standards. The updated version of the standards will apply as of the date of applicability of the relevant rules introduced to the RED by the Common Charger Directive, i.e. for handheld mobile phones, tablets, digital cameras, headphones, headsets, handheld videogame consoles, portable speakers, e-readers, keyboards, mice, portable navigation systems and earbuds, as of 28 December 2024 and, for laptops, as of 28 April 2026. This means that as from those dates a radio equipment, if it listed in Annex Ia and is capable to be recharged by means of wired charging at power above 240 W, must incorporate the harmonised charging solution up to 240 W.

The Commission will continue to update the technical specifications set out in Annex Ia, in order to reflect scientific and technological progress or market developments provided that they meet the objectives of the common charging solution.

[-] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 44 points 1 day ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

The article doesn't mention the requirement's 100W limit.

Edit: Per reply, the regulation is designed with 240W accounted for, and updatable in case of further improvements to the standard.

[-] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 day ago

Glad you did, because I was gonna make a comment about how high end gaming laptops are now illegal in the EU.

Not sure there's a 330w USB C going around I could use.

[-] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 15 points 18 hours ago

Nope, still perfectly legal. Proprietary charging ports are allowed but have to be accompanied by a USB PD port that supports the same wattage (or 240 W if the device needs more than that).

So basically the law says "devices must support USB PD", not "devices must only support USB PD".

[-] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

The limit should really be 240W, because that's what the USB-C PD 3.1 spec goes up to.

Edit: Per reply, the regulation is designed with 240W accounted for, and updatable in case of further improvements to the standard.

[-] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 21 hours ago

It is 240 W actually. Seems Techpowerup was wrong. See my first comment: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/59511400/25528592

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 12 points 23 hours ago

Gaming laptops can continue to use the typical barrel power connector on models that exceed 100 W of power

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 5 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Even if they had left out that condition, I'm sure there would be ways around it for gaming laptops and they wouldn't necessarily even have to be stupid ways: I could imagine a stupid way of complying being a charging cable with USB-C for the first 100W and proprietary port for the other 200W+.

Just because a law might say that it's got to be technically able to charge from USB-C probably doesn't imply that has to be the only charging port and method, nor even the normal/recommended one. Even on a 200W+ gaming laptop it would be nice sometimes to be able to charge it from USB-C, without pulling out the full charger. If mine supported USB-C charging I could see using it like that when I travel, I might only be using it for half an hour or an hour a day, the 100W would significantly extend the battery runtime, the rest of the time it could be sleeping or off and charging happily back to full from USB-C, so I wouldn't even need to bring the (literal) charging brick.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] amateurcrastinator@lemmy.world 23 points 23 hours ago

Oh no the innovation will suffer! How are the laptop makers going to screw the consumers now?

[-] Lexam@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Now make them put a port on each side of the laptop!

[-] nullify3112@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

What if the ports are recessed and you have built in dongles you can swap to change the port type on either slot?

Oh wait, framework did it :)

[-] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

Though, to be fair, Framework laptops can't charge from all of their ports. The 16 can charge from one port each per side; not sure about the 13 and 12.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 May 2026
518 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

84302 readers
4156 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS