It shows LLMs can do significant harm without the capabilities of an AGI.

Overhyping LLMs and overinflating their capabilities makes things worse, as people are less skeptical of LLM output.

It's also a pretty big exaggeration of what actually happened which is that it generated and posted some technically inaccurate information.

That sounds sweetly naive. "Producing innaccurate technical advice, with a confident tone, at scale" sounds like the perfect credentials for a career in consultancy.

Wait til this starts happening in the construction industry.

"Inappropriate tool also weirdly good at gas lighting engineers and managers"