Last week I provided a look at the EXT4 and XFS performance from Linux 6.12 LTS through Linux 7.0 in its current development form. As mentioned in that article and as requested by many Phoronix readers, benchmarks have since wrapped up looking at how the Btrfs copy-on-write file-system performance has evolved since that late 2024 period and all major Linux kernel releases past that Long Term Support version.

all 16 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 30 points 5 months ago* (6 children)

Maybe this is wrong, but my understanding is BTRFS is generally slower than EXT4, and that's okay. It's not going for speed

Where it shines is not in its speed but in its versatility offering compression, rollback, subvol, etc

For example, for applications, you do a lot of writes/reads to Documents or load resources like for games, so use EXT4 for /home or for a dedicated /games partition

For your system, it could be broken via config tweaks or updates, so use BTRFS to have the rollback options

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I'm still amazed from discovering filesystem-level compression.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago

    Time to git bisect ಠ_ಠ

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago* (5 children)

    Didn't the lead contributor get hyper-psychosis or was that a different filesystem?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 46 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    ai psychosis or something, but it was Kent Overstreet of Bcachefs

    Btrfs is different

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Ah bummer... I'm currently using XFS on my server because BTRFS's performance is less than stellar, although I'd love to use it to have native compression

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment