I don't see why not. Identical twins are the same age.

That why they'll ask for your ID and Fingerprints next.

ttbomk, the companies don't care.

It was a few years ago? when a woman in Taiwan showed a video where her co-worker could open her phone, because the face-recognition logic in Apple phones is calibrated to Whites, not to Asians.

I think that there are only 2 biometrics which ought be used:

1. bloodvessels-in-fingers/hands
2. retinas, blood-vessels again.

There are some diseases which monkey that, for people with those conditions, & injuries can monkey them too,

but making the bloodvessels-in-hands one be normal would mean that "ghoulies", cloned fingerprints that someone wears as rubbery coverings on their fingers, iirc, would be blocked by that, so would the tape-copying-fingerprint trick..

& making it so that the retina-scan was only done in higher-security settings, & only where you have to peer into the machine, not where it's scanning everybody who's in the lobby ( another story I read ),

& having iris-scanning for people who have retina-degenerative-conditions/injuries, as backup..

etc..

Face-scanning's a stupid "security".

Got beaten-up? now you can't open your phone.

Someone's got you at gunpoint, & they just hold your phone up at you, & it unlocks?

That isn't security, that is authority-theatre.

Which I'm fed-up with.

_ /\ _

Many people verified themselves using other people's id when it was introduced in the UK

...cool. I hadn't considered this issue yet, despite being an identical twin.

(We look different enough it probably will be fine in me and twin's case, but others, guh)

Why do you think age verification involves your face?