all 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 7 points 6 months ago

"Why not both?"

Says this administration as if it were the goal.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    Why not both? It's not like he actually cares or understands.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Trump has been extremely hostile to renewable energy and electric vehicles. Now he has intentionally caused a massive shortage of oil, globally.

    He's probably got some investments that will be extremely profitable if the price of oil goes way up. Except I seriously doubt he factored in "economic collapse" and "his own base literally coming for his head because they all drive gas guzzlers" into his plans.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    Any choice is fine so long as the media talks about anything other than the Epstein files and Trump and his buddies' implication in them.

  • source