Note: These were collected by someone else and are what's missing from the Epstein files. They were previously released.

In the files, you can see that there was a witness willing to testify, so I took out "unsubstantiated" in the headline:

Three memos that describe four interviews conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation in 2019 contain explicit but unsubstantiated claims that Donald Trump sexually abused a woman when she was a minor in the early 1980s with the assistance of Jeffrey Epstein, according to a Guardian review of those documents.

The Department of Justice did not release those records when it uploaded millions of pages of files related to Epstein beginning in December. The existence of the missing documents was first reported by independent journalist Roger Sollenberger and subsequently confirmed by NPR, causing outrage in Washington and sparking an investigation from congressional Democrats.

The Guardian obtained the missing FBI form 302 reports, which memorialize 25 pages of agents’ notes from the four interviews conducted in the summer and fall of 2019. The notes describe how the woman came forward to tell agents she recognized Epstein from a photo sent by a childhood friend. Only the first session, in which she did not name Trump, made it into the public release. The Guardian has chosen not to publish the woman’s name.

all 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 108 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Exactly why he bombed Iran.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    And his bas will lick it up like a dog in a gravey bowl.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 59 points 6 months ago

    Yeah this has always been the most telling thing about trump that so many ARE NOT jumping on. He will sue anyone for the slightest thing. Where are the slander lawsuits? Why is he quiet? The silence speaks novels.

  • source
  • [–] 57 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    the woman told agents she had been sexually abused by Epstein from the age of 13, beginning approximately in 1983, while she was living in Hilton Head Island, South Carolina.

    Better known as raping a girl.

    Tired of these weasel words.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    Maybe she used the words "sexually abused" when speaking to agents. Then this would simply be accurate reporting.

    Or maybe she said "raped" or use different words. Without saying the original it's impossible to know.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 30 points 6 months ago

    In the files, you can see that there was a witness willing to testify, so I took out "unsubstantiated" in the headline:

    This is correct, and right, and why billionaire media exists only to serve themselves.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    JFC, he bombed Iran, and y'all are still talking about this?!

    /s

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 6 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Typical Woke response, using facts to take away from the accomplishment of the greatest president in American history.

    Slandering the winner of the FIFA Peace Prize and current holder of the Nobel Peace Prize medal is shameful. Does the FIFA Peace Prize mean nothing to you?!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (2 children)

    Laying it on this thick and some dipshit will probably still whine that you didn't put le smoothbrain s on the end of this

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    There’s probs explicit video of it as well, Epstein was called the worlds greatest blackmailer

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    That's a big part of the problem: much of the best evidence, photos and videos of victims, many of them underage, in compromising situations, would be extreme privacy issues as best, and actual child porn at worst.

    We are so conditioned to accept photographic evidence over everything else, that we never really fully believe anything unless we've seen video or photos of it. This evidence exists in the Epstein Files, but it can never be released. It's a Catch-22 that protects the worst people on the planet.

    If that information came out, people would be outraged. I read a DESCRIPTION of a photograph of an underage girl being abused by several men, and just the description outraged me. There was blood, and the girl looked semi-conscious, and she said that she thought she was going to die. As it turns out, that was only ONE photo out of ten photos of this girl. But since the photos can't be shown, it doesn't make the media, which generally relies on visual media these days.

    It's time for ALL those photos to get graphic descriptions, and start releasing those descriptions with big media promotion. Just the descriptions will make people demand justice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 6 months ago

    Breaking news: fork found in kitchen

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago

    Bah they'll just say "miner" and blame it on a typo.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    I know when they say "a woman when she was a minor" means a current adult who was a minor at the time. But why does that even need to be said? Why not just say "... Trump sexually abused a child in this year."?

    The only 2 options are that she's now an adult, or deceased, which should get its own sentence or paragraph anyway.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    He abused and killed multiple minors according to some of the survivors

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    We can assume it's true if she dies within 1 or 2 years.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments