135
Lemmy devs blocklist the anime instance Ani.social from join-lemmy.org and Lemmy.ml (ani.social)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Copied from https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/5719708 :

It was added to the excluded instances because it allegedly contains loli content (CSAM)

all 19 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 64 points 2 years ago (1 child)

I've been on this instance for a about a month now, and I've not seen anything remotely like that

It would not shock me in the least if the reason this instance was put on that list was because of one of those "all weebs are pedos" jerks

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Remember when a bunch of instances banned nsfwlemmy because they allegedly allowed pedo content, when in truth they just decided to not moderate fictional characters where the age was not obvious (like potentially 18, but plus / minus a couple years)?

    I think especially Lemmy.ml should rather focus more on cleaning up their Tankie & moderator issues instead of chasing ghosts, because that instance is a toxic cesspool of assholes and disinformation.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I think especially Lemmy.ml should rather focus more on cleaning up their Tankie & moderator issues

    As much as I would love to see it, I don't think the lead devs of lemmy, who own both lemmy.ml and lemmygrad.ml, are going to ban themselves.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
    • [–] 36 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    allegedly

    A bit weird that they didnt want proof of misconduct, but hey

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It's the lemmy.ml admins/lemmy devs, didn't really expect anything else from them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [+] 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago

    It kind of cuts both ways, though. If you want to actually punish something for doing something, "allegedly" doesn't really cut it.

    Hey, I allege that lemmygrad has tons of Loli porn on it! No need to check, I'm alleging it. Guess it needs to be blacklisted now too?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • [–] 34 points 2 years ago

    It looks like ani.social they have a rule to forbid the content though might have just been posts that weren’t reported

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 24 points 2 years ago

    Well that’s a load of bullshit

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    Is ani.social federated with anyone?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    ml seems to be coming a bit unwound. They have been super ban happy lately but enforce the rules very unevenly. Hexbears can post pig shit gifs, but citing mainstream political science gets you banned pretty reliably if you do it under the wrong gaze. It really is starting to look more and more like fediverse cancer.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
    • [+] 0 points 2 years ago
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [+] 0 points 2 years ago
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •