996

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) announced just one day after the U.S. officially withdrew from the World Health Organization (WHO) that his state would become the first to join the organization’s Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network, in a seeming rebuke of the Trump administration’s withdrawal from international collaborations.

Newsom traveled this week to the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, where he was scheduled to speak at an event but was canceled at the last moment. During his trip, he met with WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] DmMacniel@feddit.org 176 points 2 weeks ago

soo when will California declare independence?

[-] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 62 points 2 weeks ago

A union with Oregon and Washington state would be nice too (us west coasters should work together)

[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

Eastern Oregon and Eastern Washington might team up with Central California and fuck it all up.

[-] dissentiate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 2 weeks ago

They can go go fuck off with Idaho, I won't miss any of em.

[-] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

Don’t they grow most of the food?

The West Coast grows most of the money. They can buy food.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] X@piefed.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

As a WA resident, I’d welcome that union.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] skeptomatic@lemmy.ca 32 points 2 weeks ago

It'll never happen, as nice as it sounds.
So I'm Canadian and we have separatists in, now 2 provinces.
Whether the latest is a conservative US psy-op, is up for debate. But that is probably part of it.
The Quebec separatists have been angry for the total of my lifetime and being from BC I've mostly ignored their plight of "different culture" but I never wanted to lose that chunk of the country and to me it's part of the greater Canadian culture.
The Alberta "separatists" are different, they are more like traitors.
Citing stats like, "Alberta (oil and gas province, the "Texas" of Canada) contributes more in equalization payments to other Canadians provinces!", which is true, as a total sum.
But the morons don't understand that equalization payments are taken from federal taxes in a bracketed tax system, so it just means on average, Albertans are richer. The rich they cry that they're not getting fair share...
Epitome of greed.
They believe because they were simply born there, moved there, that all the mineral and oil and gas profits belong to them. They're even more idiotic to believe the producers will share these profits with them.
They're not taking that away from our country, and it's worth going to war over. I think California would end up falling into the same situation of belief, though reversed between conservative and left-of-conservative views.
They'd go to war over it. So bit of a dangerous play.

[-] Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago

Yep, and the equalization payment garbage really sums up the right-leaning mentality that's pushed on society lately as well; if the results aren't immediate, it's not worth doing. These traitors scream about how they pay more than other provinces and get nothing back. The fact is they get a lot back, it's just not immediately apparent.

Equalization payments help "have-not" provinces who need the boost, which strengthens those provinces. Strengthening the "have-nots" makes Canada stronger as a whole and more united, which very much helps Alberta (and every province). The "fuck you I got mine" attitude that gets pushed by Conservative gov'ts is a toxic cancer that's spreading through the population and makes it easy for them to push their division politics, like Danielle Smith does. You're meant to get sucked into it to fight the culture war so you don't look up and fight the class war.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] dovahking@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

I'm still waiting for New California Republic, Americans.

[-] NorthwestThrills@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I get that what's I'm going to say is crazy, but I think it would be a lot easier to just remove trump from office than gain indipendence. Neither would be "easy" but balkanizing the US is just not gonna happen.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] PwnTra1n@lemmy.world 116 points 2 weeks ago

The New California Republic

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] HydraBenny@lemmy.world 92 points 2 weeks ago

I feel like the USA may start to be disbanding

[-] mrslt@lemmy.world 81 points 2 weeks ago

Unfortunately, balkanization may be our only option at this point.

[-] evol@lemmy.today 16 points 2 weeks ago

We need an East Rome West Rome split but its blue state vs red state. Each get their own President, pool Military powers

[-] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 weeks ago

Or maybe nix the president position and just have the house and senate vote for everything like a council.

[-] Dojan@pawb.social 42 points 2 weeks ago

Or maybe a parliament with proper representation instead of this stupid system you've got going right now.

[-] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 10 points 2 weeks ago

That's realistically the only fix for gerrymandering. It's a powerful weapon, and I don't foresee the two parties honoring any agreement not to use it.

[-] quips@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 weeks ago

How does a parliament fix gerrymandering?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] vladmech@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Ditch the senate and bump the house to like 1500 members imo.

[-] Galapagon@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

Keep the Senate, bump the house to like 1500

[-] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 7 points 2 weeks ago

It should be actually, if not for the Permanent Apportionment Act of 1929, based on the 1910 census.

At the time the average was 210,000 constituents per representative, now we're over 770,000 per representative. And those are averages, some districts are much higher and lower.

Congress set the current limit, they can change it. It doesn't require an amendment or anything complicated.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] quips@slrpnk.net 12 points 2 weeks ago

China recognized long ago that all states falter after around 250 years, and that renewal is a natural part of human institution.

The biggest mistake of the founding fathers was to assume the permanence of our institutions was okay since checks and balances were instituted. Really all they do is delay the time between cycles of corruption.

[-] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

One of the founders thought we should draft a new constitution from scratch every few years and they created the ammendment system specifically so any part could be scrapped and remade in case there were problems. They clearly didn't think it was perfect, just good enough for the time. They certainly didn't expect us to slow down and stop with the ammendments, at least.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

After a century of coups and destabilisation efforts around the world, the empire will crumble from within (nothing new tbh). How poetic!

[-] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 33 points 2 weeks ago

Rename it to Global Response & Outbreak Alert Network. GROAN is a better acronym than GOARN.

[-] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 weeks ago
[-] hopesdead@startrek.website 13 points 2 weeks ago

It should be Global Outbreak Response Network.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Solventbubbles@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

Global Response & Outbreak Information Network has a nice ring to it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 1 week ago

Is this not exactly what the republican party has been asking for for the last 40 years? States choosing laws and not federal?

[-] PokerChips@programming.dev 22 points 1 week ago

Republicans were never really about states rights. They were only about THEIR rights.

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 week ago

And vehemently against a bunch of you rights.

[-] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It depends on which Republicans, I suppose.

Many seem to argue about states rights in regards to the Civil War, wherein the southern states wanted rights to enter northern states and force them to obey the southern State's laws...

To me, enforcing laws across state lines seems far more Federalist than State isolationist.

And I would argue many claiming "States Rights" today want their states rules to be enacted in other states as well, e.g. the push to federally ban abortions

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Only applied when it's their rights. Otherwise they'll pull some mental gymnastics like the AI bros pulled for AI deregulation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AlexLost@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago

Just break up already. The divorce was evident long ago, I wish you both could see it. You can't coexist because you want different things. You want to live in different worlds. Move on already.

[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago

The US divorcing itself is the best thing that could happen right now. It won't be pretty, but neither is staying with a domestic abuser.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BlackPenguins@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Sweet. Come on New York, do it next. If Trump won't protect us, our state can.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Muffi@programming.dev 11 points 2 weeks ago

Imagine traveling back in time to the 80's and telling people that one day Donald Trump would start the dissolution of The United States.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago

Please bilaterally secede already, California

[-] JackFrostNCola@aussie.zone 5 points 1 week ago

Man i would love to see california take their GDP from the USA (and all the other blue states/cities for that matter) and see how MAGA erupts. Stream it live and i'll go get popcorn.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago

Viva Alta California

[-] nao@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago

Why did the US want to leave WHO in the first place? Is there anything to gain from leaving?

[-] Bongles@lemmy.zip 19 points 2 weeks ago

The current administration is dismantling all of the global things the US has been a part of under the guise of the US being "ripped off" and it's actively making shit worse.

Feels intentional to me but I don't know the end goal.

[-] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 8 points 2 weeks ago

Praxis. Thiel and other oligarchs want to divvy up the United States into fiefdoms, where they personally set laws and have the king's right to your family's bedrooms.

Such is the times, that I am not sure if this is an exaggeration. 😒

[-] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Less funding "woke" organizations, means more money for the billionaires.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Time for the entire west coast to align with Canada and Mexico and expel the MAGATs from our states

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2026
996 points (99.5% liked)

World News

53521 readers
2255 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS