We have very different fedi interactions. Have a nice day!

"This fucking place stinks! It's a piece of shit. I'm done! I quit! Fuck you!"

*turns up an hour later*

True, there's definitely that. I guess I just wish there was more thought between that and "do I really need to post this?"

And those who buck the system are fired.

......... or worse.

And we're all socialized by corporate platforms to engage with eachother in a way that prioritizes engagement, which we bring with us when we come to the fediverse

Now I'm raging at your misuse of "it's"

> Veganism is abstainment from, as far as is possible and practicable, the exploitation of animals for any purpose.

> Editable meme templates are "exploitables".

> Memes with animals are animal exploitation.

> These are therefore not vegan and hereby banned from /c/vegan@lemmy.world.

Nice. My ragebait is mostly solar powered so also largely guilt free.

So, like a club?

federated.sandwich.es 🤤

One of my favorite subreddits back when posting photoshopped pictures of birds with arms was all the rage was /r/notbirdswitharms which was a sub where you couldn't not just post birds with arms, you couldn't post anything that wasn't a sandwich

I wish we had Lemmy Gold here because I'd award this comment.

What if I told you that you don't have to do that?

I prefer "scaled", which is even more like a recommendation system.

If it is Top, then that is what people are choosing to upvote. But you don't have to browse by Top. PieFed even offers keyword filters, plus the ability to unsubscribe from all such communities while also allowing you to see them with just the touch of a button to go to a Topic Feed showing it when you (rarely) actually do want it. You could also replicate this behavior in Lemmy, but it takes having one account per Internet area and that's a huge pain. Or you could just sort by New. Or block the users submitting such content. The list of configuration options available to you is practically endless, and nowhere explained in the slightest degree that would be helpful:-).

!nonpolitical_comics@piefed.social does a pretty good job of keeping that stuff out.

Ok, 5-16% is precise enough that you must have an interesting methodology to share but you were waiting for a question to prompt an answer. This is that comment.

I can't even fathom what contemporary Facebook is like. I deleted it in, I think, 2009 or thereabouts, right after they changed the timeline from reverse chronological to whatever their first iteration of the engagement-based one is. I thought that sucked pretty bad, so, yeah, can't even imagine how bad it is today.