all 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 142 points 8 months ago (2 children)

News headlines in my country are like "Spotify attacked!!", "Millions of music tracks stolen!!".

Hilarious...

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 72 points 8 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 50 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (6 children)

    Correction: you need a 200TB hardrive. By now, at least 100TB is AI generated shit music that you don't need.

    Edit: these numbers are an (un)educated guess based on my vibes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Where does that number come from?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    While some will be AI, they did filter by songs with at least some play. The millions of AI songs that get uploaded likely get very little play.

    But then there’s some AI artists that are getting millions of plays a month….

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 66 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Let’s go for a 300TB USB key on AliExpress

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [+] 44 points 8 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)
  • [–] 48 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    The only songs reencoded to that quality is a sample of the 0-streams songs, which do make up a lot of the total count.

    Everything that has been listened to at least once is in high quality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 8 months ago

    0-popularity, not 0-streams, which are two different metrics according to the archive blog post. But nevertheless, the re-encoded stuff is stuff pretty much no one will miss. Also Opus at 75kbps is much better than Vorbis or mp3 at that bitrate.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    I've literally never been unable to find ogg, flac or mp3s for any album on Soulseek. Why is scraping Spotify even necessary?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    There is probably a lot of listening data that could be useful. Say you like a particular song, you could look at what other songs people who stream that do also streamed a lot?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    What I've read is it's about: Preservation.

    This aint just about piracy because free media.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    And that's why I think it's an issue. The least popular tracks, which are the most likely ones to disappear from the internet, are the ones they store in the lowest quality. While I'm glad they made this huge effort for preservation, and understand the limitations of storage space, I also wish they would have at least preserved the original 160kbps streams.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 39 points 8 months ago

    I feel like this will put them much more under the authorities target, music is much more sensible than books, simply because it moves more money..

    Anyway I still am wondering how they managed to do this and how they still didn't get caught, there must be reeeally good devs there.

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

    One day (communities, localities or government libraries) will again host public goods information with free access. Fighting intellectual monopoly is fighting for the return of local libraries (just the modern ones).

    The absurdity that western governments fight archivists is beyond insane. They should be helping to distribute and host the data.

    The half life of data is getting worse not better in the digital age. These pirates are doing the work of the public good and being vilified.

    See: https://topdocumentaryfilms.com/digital-amnesia/

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    If instead of a giant omnibus torrent they put a folder structure on IPFS, it would be essentially a fully available streaming Spotify clone with the ability for people to "pin" tracks or albums or artists to have them stay locally on their device...

    Just saying...

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Very cool, though the quality leaves a bit to be desired.

    For popularity>0, we got close to all tracks on the platform. The quality is the original OGG Vorbis at 160kbit/s. Metadata was added without reencoding the audio (and an archive of diff files is available to reconstruct the original files from Spotify, as well as a metadata file with original hashes and checksums).

    For popularity=0, we got files representing about half the number of listens (either original or a copy with the same ISRC). The audio is reencoded to OGG Opus at 75kbit/s — sounding the same to most people, but noticeable to an expert.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Nice.

    Would have been happy to pay but they just had to be a$$#oles

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    why must every good site draw attention to themselves like this? Make alternative site for music if you must make such a spectacle out of it, so when the hammer falls it doesnt take out the books too. Or at least have some kind of plan on how to survive it, which i really hope they do.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    The content is distributed across numerous torrents. It's decentralized. Also there's a reason pirate bay is still up, while the other centralized players aren't.. . design distributed systems that aren't vulnerable to easy take downs.

    Speed, security or cost, pick two.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    yes, but what about annas archive itself? Decentralization is good and resilient, but the authoritans will attack the website and its maintainers directly. Maybe they will try blocking it, or demonize it and its users or maybe they will even start uploading malware there to make it worse to use. In general, as long as things stay out of general public's view they are somewhat safe, but I bet this will have at least some news organizations mention it.

    Each day we have less and less rights and protections so we(as in the piracy community in general) have to make sure we will survive despite of that. Not just for ourselves but to preserve things for everyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Call me when it's actually released. "We'll release the music in the future" is worth exactly as much content as "we'll release a Batgirl movie".

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    LET'S FUCKING GO

  • source