all 20 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
[–] 16 points 9 months ago (1 child)

Billionaires won't rest until they end life on Earth. A lot of these psychopaths believe in the big replacement. They are morons having no clue that they too will die.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    I haven't read the article, but know a little bit. This is a thing only a person that thinks space is magic would think is a good idea. The big reason is heat. More specifically how to get rid of it. Our more realistic and earthbound data centers primarily use electricity to power cooling. How do you get rid of the heat in space? There's nothing to transfer the heat to.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Also, power. MFers acting like we got dilithium crystals up in here. And yeah, we probably could do Star Trek style ships if we had a way to make power in space…but we don’t, like, at ALL

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Umm... We absolutely do, solar panels. Constant full exposure to the sun adds up quick, especially when they don't even need structural support

    There's plenty of problems with this idea, but power is the one strong point

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago

    Perhaps you should review the power that solar panels designed for space flight can draw vs the requirements of a single GPU.

    We are not even close to having robust enough solar panels to make this a reality, let alone powering a datacenter full of GPUs.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Anyone else feel like they are only floating this idea so that data centers in neighborhoods driving up the cost of electricity and polluting everything looks better by comparison?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    To clarify, the article is just saying that it's wildly unfeasible and prohibitively expensive.

    They're not saying it's dangerous or going to harm people in some way.

    I feel like some people may get the wrong idea from the headline.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (1 child)

    It's absolutely harmful to waste resources on worthless grifting at the expense of the planet and people suffering from very real deprivation.

    That's part of why it's the same people promoting both the grift and the deprivation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    i believe that cooling in space is EVEN HARDER then cooling in atmosphere. something about a near vacuum being a terrible, terrible thermal conductor

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    Yeah, but that's the point. It's a boondoggle. Grifters need a bottomless hole for marks to pour money down.

  • source