this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2025

63 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

7,236 readers

3,122 active

250 users here now

News community around technology, social media platforms, information technology and governmental policy surrounding it.

What doesn't fit here?

The core of the story has to be technology focused.

If article mentions "AI" in a sentence and then talks about business economics that doesn't make it tech news.
Gaming is too many layers removed from technology. There are many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
Transporation is too many layers removed from technology. EVs while use many cool technologies have many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
Entertainment is too many layers removed from technology. While sometimes it can fit here, business or cultural aspects of it are a better fit for dedicated communities.
Cybersecurity. While it heavily focuses on technology, most of the time it's too technical for most people who are not already invested in it. Should be posted in a dedicated communities unless it has broader connection to other tech areas.

Post guidelines

Title format

Post title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.

URL format

Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.

[Opinion] prefix

Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.

Country prefix

Country prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.

Rules

1. English only

Title and associated content has to be in English.

2. Use original link

Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.

3. Respectful communication

All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.

4. Inclusivity

Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.

5. Ad hominem attacks

Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.

6. Off-topic tangents

Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.

7. Instance rules may apply

If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.

Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago

moderators

BrikoX@lemmy.zip

Datacenters in space are a terrible, horrible, no good idea. (taranis.ie)

submitted 9 months ago by cm0002@libretechni.ca to c/technology@lemmy.zip

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

To clarify, the article is just saying that it's wildly unfeasible and prohibitively expensive.

They're not saying it's dangerous or going to harm people in some way.

I feel like some people may get the wrong idea from the headline.

permalink

fedilink

source

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

You mean they didn't mention that the laws of physics make data transfer to and from orbit an absolute PitA and that no one would sit around for that long?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 9 months ago* (1 child)

It's absolutely harmful to waste resources on worthless grifting at the expense of the planet and people suffering from very real deprivation.

That's part of why it's the same people promoting both the grift and the deprivation.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments