669
Been meaning to do this to my players (startrek.website)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/rpgmemes@ttrpg.network
30 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

all 35 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 51 points 2 years ago

Dog shaped gelatinous cube.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 51 points 2 years ago (17 children)

    So I don't really know much about DnD and was wondering what exactly would be happening moving forward here? Does the Paladin receive some sort of debuff and then has to fight the creature alone? I don't really have any ideas

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
    •
  • [–] 92 points 2 years ago (12 children)

    The Paladin would try to convince the rest of the party NOT to go help the poor little doggo.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    Wouldn't it be obvious that it's not a dog though. You don't need to see the image to know it's not gonna be a dog, given the setup

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] 58 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    Part of roleplaying is not metagaming. Even if the players suspect something is wrong, you play like you don't because your character would not know that. At least I find it more fun to play that way. I'm not there to min/max my adventure.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    I wouldn’t even akin meta gaming to min-maxing, I’d say its closer to cheating. Not everyone plays the same obviously, and I’m sure some are fine with it. But your character is acting on information they couldn’t possibly know.

    I get that it’s not technically cheating at a lot of tables, which is why we call it meta gaming instead, but still… it’s kinda BS.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    It's only cheating if you know for sure what the DM is going to do and they are not just messing with you. This situation could totally just be an actual dog that only the Paladin thinks is a monster due to DM nonsense.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    The players may know something is up, but the characters do not, so for the sake of roleplay there should be a conflict between the paladin and the rest of the group.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [+] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    It depends on a lot of things. Typically you don't want to use "outside" knowledge. So if you and the group are bullshitting before the session and you learn your paladin has high af perception you'd try not to let that knowledge bleed over into your character. But if it naturally comes up in the game "my paladin keeps passing perception checks that I keep failing" it'd be similar to noticing you have a really perceptive friend and you begin to trust their instincts a bit more and more.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    The characters probably shouldn't know the exact stats, but I mean, some things are reasonably obvious. For example if the barbarian pc turned an enemy into mush with a single hit in the last battle, the character can assume that they're very strong. And so on.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago*

    I assume the Paladin would either have to try to roll to persuade the other players that it's definitely not a Labrador, dispell whatever illusion the creature is casting, or they would indeed have to fight them alone (possibly with the other players trying to stop them, cause who kills a Labrador)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago*

    As a DM you just watch how the players handle it. Very fun to cause such a conflict between your players where you force them into opposing roles.
    In short: you set the scene and watch 'em dance. 😄

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • [+] 27 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
    [removed by mod]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
    • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Wait, don’t all dogs talk and fly?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
    • [–] 8 points 2 years ago*

    My players shall curse you for the fun you'll have given me on their next trek out of the city. I'm think Yeth hound stats but I'm flexible atm. Maybe a shadow.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I used this image in a horror one shot after I saw it. Lots of fun there, they were kids on a school camping trip rather than an adventuring party and occasionally they’d spot it in the woods.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
    • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Whats the creature?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    A barkbark obviously.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
    • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Call of Cthulhu vibes here. Some rolls you want to fail, because you're better off not knowing.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    "Komm da weg, Idioten!"

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •