top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 138 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (7 children)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 85 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    I expect better of the rail network in America. This is a tiny network for the size country we are.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The thing is the rail network was pretty comprehensive at one point. Only a few remain.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It still is, if you're a piece of rail freight.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    it takes me 24 hours to go by train the same distance it takes me to fly 1.5 hours. and the cost is the same. there are some problems.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 75 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 36 points 1 year ago (21 children)

    why do all tracks lead to Florida?

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 126 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Its the other way around, there needs to be as many ways to get out of Florida as possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago

    One reason for this is hurricanes are more frequent, and sometimes the notice level is too short to have safe evacuation from Miami through highway systems. There has been anger over deaths from evacuation, when a storm warning did not destroy as many homes as was "hoped"/feared.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    A bunch of individual reasons.

    Chock Full-0-Sea ports

    Nasa historically moved a lot of big stuff over rail.

    Florida has a shit ton of Agriculture but a lack of raw materials

    Tourism

    It's flat as hell

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • Chock Full-0-Sea ports

    Is really the big reason. Less and less portage is going through the traditional East Coast hubs of NY and NJ, mostly going to places like Louisiana , Texas, and Florida instead.

    Historically Florida has always been pretty big on trains as well. In fact you used to be able to take a train from Florida to Cuba....kinda. You could take a train across the overseas rail line to Key West where they would ferry the whole train car over to Cuba.

    We used to be an actual country that did stuff, and that's because we weren't afraid to do cool stuff with trains.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 27 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I assume the gray gaps are due to red states refusing to get on the Tylenol/Autism Train, but I can't believe, if the Autist Party were in power, they wouldn't insist on connecting ALL the dots.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I would think that Kansas City would be a bigger hub since it already has a lot of rail through there and is more central in the country.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    for freight, not passenger rail, which is what high-speed rail is primarily designed for

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Freight rail is a lot less than it should be as well.

    It is also owned by Private Industry without clear rules on what they can charge in that more than it should be.

    The rails were only made with eminent domain, Private Industry should not be able to screw people on it, or give preference to large companies over people and small ones.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    My dumb ass thought this was a ticket to ride map for a minute.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 20 points 1 year ago* (14 children)

    The most efficient would be 3 major east/west lines, Boston to Seattle, DC to San Francisco, and Atlanta to LA, connected by a series of north/south lines to form a grid. On the east coast, just extend the Acela down to Atlanta.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago* (12 children)

    You need to hit major centres and you need to consider common trips to be efficient. You’re talking about the most efficient per station but most efficient per passenger is going to look different. This image doesn’t see too bad and can still have branching lines.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (10 children)

    The biggest concern with that setup is how inefficient it is to reach the Pacific Northwest region, LA is a serious bottleneck on top of being a common endpoint in and of itself. A line that goes straight to either Seattle or Portland from the Northeast simplifies things a lot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    The problem is that population distribution means that almost nobody is going to be getting on or off the train between Minneapolis and Seattle. The population of North Dakota is 800k, South Dakota is 925k, Nebraska is 2 million, Montana is 1.1 million, Wyoming is 590k, Idaho is 2 million. That's nearly a whole quadrant of the country with less population than the Houston metro area. If we're building trains, let's build trains in Houston and serve the same number of people with like a tiny percentage of track that it would take to serve the upper plains states.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • [–] 18 points 11 months ago (27 children)
  • [–] 62 points 11 months ago (25 children)

    Trains are a common special interest of people with autism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • load more comments (15 replies)
  • [–] 13 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Train Simulator players: heavy breathing

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›