563
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

She’s embarked on a nationwide tour with Vermont’s Independent Senator Bernie Sanders, held town halls outside of her district in upstate New York, and raised $15 million

Democratic Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a progressive who has cemented her popularity with young voters, is reportedly considering running for president or the Senate in 2028.

Ocasio-Cortez, 35, made a splash when she was elected to represent New York’s 14th congressional district, located in the Bronx and Queens, in 2019. Now, the Democrat is reportedly considering taking the next step in her political career as the party searches for its next generation of leaders, Axios reported Friday.

Members of Ocasio-Cortez’s team have recently been positioning the progressive lawmaker, known as AOC, to either run for president or run for a Senate seat.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 18 points 2 hours ago

“Plotting” is an infuriating word choice.

I’d vote for her. I’m not interested in entertaining any arguments about electability. The least electable person in the universe has won the presidency twice. If enough people vote for her she is electable.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

" is reportedly considering running for president or the Senate in 2028."

Stupid clickbait title.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago

She is one of only two people I would be excited to vote for.

The other person is Jon Stewart.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 14 hours ago

I think both oligarchs and corporatists alike will fight far too hard to take her down. The US would need a far more fair and democratic procedure to elect someone that would change the paradigm like AOC--especially since Citizens United.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

But why is there such this defeatist attitude any time someone remotely not terrible tries to do something? It’s like we’re doing the fascists work for them with talk like this. I get that fuckery happens any time someone kinda different or kinda maybe good (for a politician) steps up, but that can be overcome with more support. When the margins are thin, it’s easy for them to cheat. When they aren’t, it’s fucking not. So let’s stop making the margins tighter with this kind of talk

[-] [email protected] 27 points 16 hours ago
[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago

Yes, such dastardly plans.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

Conspicuous in their, uh, inconspicuity

[-] [email protected] 11 points 16 hours ago

I'm picturing that family guy skin shade card, but the top says "decisive executive leadership" while the bottom says "plotting/conspiring."

[-] [email protected] 9 points 14 hours ago

Whatever, I’ll wait for the official announcement. Love AOC but not getting my hopes up. Wait till there’s actual news.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 17 hours ago

I was very disappointed no Tim Walz in that list of other potential candidates. He was the best part of the Harris / Walz ticket

[-] [email protected] 15 points 17 hours ago

Yes please if only for her age. I want old people out of power and I mean that across the entire spectrum including Bernie sanders. He would be great in her cabinet but we need young people FFS

[-] [email protected] 6 points 17 hours ago

Why? I'm all for AOC and it has nothing to do with her age. I don't see anything magical about someone's age when it comes to setting policy. I like AOC, but I also like wisdom and experience.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 17 hours ago

Geriatrics running the country don't have to worry about personally experiencing any of the negative long term consequences of their actions.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 17 hours ago

Maybe, but if they are progressive and/or have basic empathy and understanding, they understand the morality of planting a seed you may never see become a tree.

Young demons that have been radicalized by The Algorithm and the GOP are not going to GAF if they have the wrong ethics, no matter what age they are.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 16 hours ago

But we're repeatedly seeing most geriatric politicians not have basic empathy, especially on one side.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago

I also think, at the very least, if they're a young narcissist, they at least are thinking they'll be alive another 40-50 years and want a world, versus the ones who know time is running out.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago

Perspective and optics. The millennials were robbed of their chance on the world stage by the boomers. The boomers perspective doesn't work for what the world is now. People need to see a representation of themselves up there. A representative of the people for the people by the people yada yada yada

[-] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago

The millennials were robbed of their chance on the world stage by the boomers.

Gen X over there like "What the fuck!?!" (I'm a millennial, I get the plight.)

[-] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago

Can’t have it both ways, the same people who complain about the geriatric GOP also want Bernie. You can follow his policy but it’s ridiculous at his age to have him in the White House

[-] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago

You won't see me complaining about the GOP simply because some of them might be "geriatric". It's their policies that are the issue. JD seems very fresh-faced to me, but that guy is the front-man for some truly crazy shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 13 points 18 hours ago

IF there is something to run in 2028.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I feel like shit typing this but I'm afraid America will not vote for a woman, each time it's resulted in disaster.

Sure I'll vote for her, but frankly we need a sure thing, we got a lot of mess to fix, starting with shoring up our constitution against bad faith actors and arresting and prosecuting fascist criminals.

Disbanding the heritage foundation, impeach and remove supreme court justices, reverse citizens United, and remove voting rights of all those pardoned for J6.

Fox news should be made an example of with laws preventing their type of misinformation and propaganda and they should be destroyed.

Scientific fact will be the rule and the standard. Education and our core of government will be free from all religion. Any church or religious organizations in politics will be taxed and disqualified from government.

So many people need to face consequences and I hope you all have a list and are keeping score.

The gloves are fucking off.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

You are delusional my friend.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 19 hours ago

Here's to hoping AOC is another Mamdani during the primaries.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 14 hours ago

I hope she wins

[-] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago

She needs to go for Chuck’s seat instead

[-] [email protected] 4 points 15 hours ago

100% agree - maybe that's the plan.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 20 hours ago

Yeah Schmucker has got to go.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

Schumer writing a strongly worded letter to AOC this very instant.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago

I like her. She can't win. Go for Senate.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

Any democrat who runs on a populist message that doesn't just pander to working Americans can win the presidency... just not the primary.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 17 hours ago

I’ll be voting for her if she is the clear path to overcome tyranny. If not, I’ll be voting for whoever that person is.

[-] [email protected] 46 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If this is "plotting", then I am all for this "villain" to win. The wording of the headline implies that AOC is a bad thing, when we got...waves at orange fuckwit

Anyhow, if given the choice between AOC and Newsom, AOC all the way.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago

So AOC vs Erika Kirk?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago

Mixed feelings; still figuring out my emotions surrounding this. My immediate inclination is to want to say "become a Senator or Gov. first."

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2025
563 points (97.0% liked)

politics

25730 readers
2745 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS