Margaret Hamilton, NASA's lead developer for Apollo program, stands next to all the code she wrote by hand that took humanity to the moon in 1969

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 183 points 3 years ago (18 children)

She didn’t write all of that, she had a team of programmers working under her

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    She was the first software engineer who was hired for the project and did write a good chunk of the code. She was more than someone who simply delegates and leads. Hell, she is the one who coined the term software engineer. She played a hell of a role in the history of software development. Let's not try to diminish that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    He isn't trying to diminish but these misleading exaggerated titles are pretty annoying and confusing at times.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago

    I agree that the title is misleading but simply saying she was the one directing the team without also mentioning that she absolutely did write a chunk of that is also misleading and diminishes her contribution to the code.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 109 points 3 years ago (9 children)

    Really like her white and gold dress

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 100 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (8 children)

    Man, I thought when we left Reddit shit was going to change?

    First off, SHE didn't write all the code, she led a team (And probably wrote a decent chunk herself). It wasn't by hand it was on computers, no one writes computer code by hand, that's just blatantly a myth, even punch cards were normally done BY the computer, not "by hand".

    Also something I've questioned before is if that's really "The source code" and not maybe 11 copies (There's 11 binders there) Though most reports from reputable sources say that's "Listings". AKA that's the logging, not the code itself. The code itself may be printed out but would be kept on Punch cards (Again printed by the computer, not by hand). And the final form was actually a rope. (no really)

    The thing is the story of Margaret Hamilton (And in fact most programmers of the time) is incredible enough. But when you blatantly lie like this it actually diminishes her accomplishment because it's obviously false and people will tear it down or disbelieve it because it's blatant misinformation.

    This is why I left Next Fucking Level, because it became misinformation and karma whoring. It became about the "Story" rather than the actual person/skill/talent/figure. But on Reddit the reason was because people wanted Karma. Shouldn't we have left the basement tier BS and lying behind as well?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I don't know how old you are but when I was first introduced to programming in the early 80s all "source code" (Mostly basic and thus interpreted where program is the source code) was referred to as "listings" (this was when the main source of games were monthly magazines where you typed in a listing from a magazine and saved it to tape E.G.. The "Program listings" (as the Smithsonian calls them) seem to be print outs of the programs for verification purposes.

    The process of entering was indeed handwritten, on specially printed sheets of paper that was then handed to a punchcard operator to create the cards (again according to the Smithsonian), But the stack of paper is clearly not those sheets as it is form-feed printer paper.

    It is completely accurate that Margaret Hamilton lead a team, so while there are inaccuracies I'd say this not as much of a lie as just a combination of confused concepts,

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [+] 64 points 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 60 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Including comments on the code with expressions like "Crank the silly thing arround", "see if he's lying", "off to see the wizard" and a sub-routine called "burnbaby". More here: https://www.sciencealert.com/the-code-that-took-astronauts-to-the-moon-is-now-on-github

    She's definitely a legend.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Did you know that programs for the Apollo guidance computer were woven, by hand, in to Core Rope Memory modules?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    TIL

    She invented the term "software engineering"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 29 points 3 years ago

    Twitter employee getting ready for a code review with Elon

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 3 years ago (11 children)

    Imagine having to look for the missing semicolon in there.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 19 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    And clickbait arrives on lemmy

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 17 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    This is the video of when she received the Medal of Freedom from Barack Obama: youtube.com/watch?v=X1PNp_YggAA

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 16 points 3 years ago (9 children)

    Wouldn't it have worked better if she wrote it into the computer? 🤔

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    She wrote code without stack overflow for her job, and the code worked as intended. That alone is worthy of respect.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 15 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    These people should have millions of followers instead we follow kardashians. No wonder the world is going to end😥

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    She did computer stuff..... She's smart enough to not fuck with anything that has followers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Google did a cool tribute in 2019: g.co/Margaretbymoonlight

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 14 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    None of you better call yourselves nerds, THIS is a nerd.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 14 points 3 years ago* (6 children)

    Amazing. Punch cards are before my time but did she have to plot out the code before creating punch cards? I'm wondering about the " by hand " part of it.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 13 points 3 years ago*

    The "Women of NASA" Lego set includes a display of a minifig Margaret Hamilton based on this photo.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago

    Such a legend! Every time I see this post I'm stunned by the impact she made

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago (11 children)

    Also worth remembering: The Apollo guidance computer had less compute power than a USB charger. That thing sent us to the moon. https://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/a30916315/usb-c-charger-apollo-11-computer/

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›