following this URL https://feddit.nl/post/32689004. it looks like the software taken down the source and the codeberg is gone

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 60 points 1 year ago (38 children)

Access to macOS and Windows releases are currently restricted to sponsors, a 5 USD monthly sponsorship is required.

What the fuck?

Fuck that, isn't this just a maintained fork of clementine??

And I tried this player, it's nothing special

I could understand a permanent nag button like nanazip, but $60/year where most of the hard job (libraries, decoders, base ui) was done by someone else for free?

I'm blacklisting this shit even if I'm a Linux user

  • source
  • hideshow 38 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    What is wrong with this policy? Strawberry is GPL, this sounds like the dev is committed enough to FOSS to not care too much about issues that come up on proprietary operating systems. This is very obviously not going to bring in a lot of money, how many people do you picture using windows or mac who think strawberry is so much better than other options that it's worth paying for? They're not advertising this in any way, there's no plot to trick poor souls into paying.

    It strikes me as an easy and effective way to dismiss without argument bugfix requests on operating systems the developer doesn't care to touch. It's saying we don't want to neglect any users on other platforms that sincerely care about our project, but otherwise we just want to prioritze FOSS, so let's write off essentially all proprietary OS users while providing an avenue in case someone actually does care about our project that much.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 1 year ago (31 children)

    what do you think the best local music/mp3 player?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 31 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 48 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    I am the author of Strawberry Music Player and I would like you to remove it from the winget package manager.
    The source code repository and releases from https://codeberg.org/WetOtter44/StrawberryMusicPlayer that you use as source for these packages are not official. It is an unofficial clone of the official source code repository for Strawberry Music Player (https://github.com/strawberrymusicplayer/strawberry), with misleading releases tagged to the wrong commits. If this was a valid fork, it should be renamed to not misrepresent our community project, and any links should not point to our bug tracker and support forum. The person who uploaded these were given the binary installations files from me for testing purposes, he has since proven willing to harm the project, I won't share his real name, but as you can see by the profile on codeberg he is anonymous for these reasons. He may upload releases containing malicious executables. The official Windows releases for Strawberry Music Player are given to users on request, I do not want it included in a package manager where users can install Strawberry Music Player without any information on how to fund the project.

    First part valid, but last sentence lol. Open source go brrrr.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    Bit strange, the Strawberry app itself already mentions how to donate in the Help/About Strawberry window. Maybe the dev could distribute the Windows/MacOS binaries and simply code in a massive donation pop-up when the OS detected <> Linux.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    @brickfrog @far_university1990 The dev saying it's about "information on how to fund the project" is being... misleading. Windows binaries from the project are paywalled, so alternate builds being distributed via Winget presents a pretty clear threat to that funding by being free and more convenient.* They're well within their right to not distribute their own builds for free, but the misleading way it's framed here is not endearing... especially given this is a fork of another piece of FOSS software that will happily provide you Windows builds.

    * As an aside, it really is so much better to have stuff distributed by a package manager. Who the hell wants to download an installer from Patreon for every new release, honestly. Some devs drive me crazy with their insistence on asinine distribution channels.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Post title misleading, Strawberry project still up and running at https://github.com/strawberrymusicplayer/strawberry , coincidentally I had just installed it on Debian 13. Then saw this post saying Strawberry was taken down except that it wasn't.

    Like the other comment says this is just about unofficial binaries that were floating around. That said it's kind of a bummer that Windows/Mac users can't download pre-compiled binaries from their github page. Maybe someone can create a script that does the downloading/compiling for those OSes similar to how some ffmpeg scripts do it e.g. https://github.com/UBTL/ffmpeg-windows-build

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 4 points 1 year ago

    Yes, I updated the title. But, I do not think the author happy with the fork that promote automated compiling because as it said from the takedown post it disrupt the subscription fees

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

    I was wondering when that repo showed up and all of a sudden there were 50k downloads of the windows version if this might happen.

    The coderberg fork was linked directly to the main strawberry page where the source code is and it's pretty obvious the downloads were just the same as any subscriber executables.

    I highly doubt the story that the person behind the fork was given binaries for testing. My guess is it was just a subscriber sharing their downloaded executables.

    The whole malware argument the creator made is fear mongering.

    Its odd he charges $7/month for subscribers on Patreon but its only $5 if you pay via Kofi.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Patreon takes a 20% cut of your income right off the bat. This is with the 8% platform fee option, and when you stack it on top of the payment processing fees, that's what it comes out to be.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Well i've setup a fork and modified the workflow file to build windows and macos: https://github.com/PorcoDio00033/strawberry/actions/runs/17040509548

    I've not tested those binaries because i dont use that player, but they should work because entire workflow ran without errors.

    The original repo already builds both windows + macos binaries, but it pushes them to a private server, not publically in actions/releases.

    Paywalling binaries doesnt make sense lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (12 children)

    https://github.com/strawberrymusicplayer/strawberry this not it?

    Edit:

    The program is free software, released under GPL. If you like this program and can make use of it, consider sponsoring or donating to help fund the project.

    Illegal not provide source.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] [S] 11 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    the problem is the original Windows and macOSX is version are paywalled. The codeberg version are the compiled versions and the free alternatives

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    You can still compile it from source.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] [S] 10 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    convenience especially with winget is still the best and not everyone is the developer

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Submit build script to winget build directly from their repo?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Winget just downloads an installer from the source.

    Microsoft doesn't provide build time or hosting space (except if you're using GitHub)

    Repo only contains URL to download and hash for check

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I mean winget contain script that download from official repo then compile on user pc. Like aur pkgbuild.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›