top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 360 points 1 year ago (16 children)
  • [–] 133 points 1 year ago (7 children)
    • Working class: retirement vegan
    • American: healthcare vegan
    • German: humour vegan

    My god, it's unstoppable

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • load more comments (12 replies)
    [–] 177 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    "AI vegans"

    ffs, just publish an article with a single clownemoji for the same effect.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 82 points 1 year ago* (23 children)

    The big corporations desperately want AI to be popular because they've thrown literally insane amounts of money at it and still don't know how to monetize it.

    There's going to be a huge push to make it seem like everyone loves it and it's weird not to use it constantly

    It's going to go horribly and come off like that "fellow kids" meme, exactly like this headline

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • load more comments (23 replies)
  • [–] 152 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    It’s quite common for me to be annoyed, angry, or upset at a headline writer. Then there’s the feeling I got reading “Meet the AI vegans.”

    Whole new level.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 118 points 1 year ago

    This is such a stupid name for this.

  • source
  • [–] 108 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Abstaining from a thing does not make one a vegan. That's not how any of this works.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 102 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Calling them after a maligned (if harmless) group seems like a choice to paint refusing to use AI as being annoying, preachy and scorn-worthy.

    They seem very determined to pressure people into using AI regardless of it's practicality, environmental impact, or anything. Fuck this shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago

    There’s been recent pushes in that regard, investment in AI shit has been enormous but the financial payoff for anyone besides hardware manufacturers remains nonexistent. So investors and corporations have recently redoubled their efforts into trying to get everyone to use it in the hopes that this somehow will make them profitable.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 86 points 1 year ago*

    "Have you ever been called an AI vegan?"

    "No... Shit no! I believe saying something like that'd get your ass kicked!"

  • source
  • [–] 73 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    how to belittle and minimize a very serious thing: call any protesters of it a " ___ vegan"

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [+] 71 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 64 points 1 year ago

    People just going about their business living their lives as they have for many years...

    Silicon Valley: Hey fuck you. Also I came up with a dumb nickname for you.

  • source
  • [–] 62 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    "Newspaper which uses AI to write its articles concocts derogatory term for people who doesn't use AI"

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 59 points 1 year ago (16 children)

    This makes about as much sense as calling Linux users "Windows vegans".

    Choosing to not use AI isn't some wacky contrarian position, it's a tame position that can easily be justified. (Don't want to use AI? Then don't.) If anything, trying to assert that constantly using AI for everything would be the new normal is the wacky position.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • load more comments (16 replies)
    [–] 53 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    i wonder if they came up with such term to mock those who dont want to use ai and possibly actual vegans on the side.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    And here i am not using it because I'm old and cranky.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 41 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    I refuse to use it because it's shit.

    We are not the same.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (13 replies)
    [–] 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    What bullshif us this?

    A. I vegan is a nonesence title.

    How about " people who don't want the world to end even faster tell corps to fuck off"

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 40 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I try not to use AI at all. I am not missing out on anything.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 40 points 1 year ago (15 children)

    I don't use A.I. because I've had nothing but negative interactions with A.I. Customer service bots that fail to give adequate responses, unhelpful and incorrect search result summaries, and, "art," that looks like shit hasn't made me want to sign up for ChatGPT or Gemini. For most people, this isn't a moral stance, it's just that the product isn't worth paying for. Stop framing people that don't use A.I. as luddites with an ax to grind just because tech bros spent billions on a product that isn't good yet.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • load more comments (15 replies)
    [–] 37 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    I applaud folks like this - they make a choice and stick with it. No "I'll never use AI to generate art but I vibe code to save time" hypocrisy. No "I use it to help me with maths, but I'd never use it to steal artistic work".

    Just straight up "it is an environmental hazard, it is unethical, not engaging". Should be called "AI Ethicists" rather than "AI Vegans".

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (13 replies)
    [+] 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Im also a gun vegan, a car vegan, a facebook vegan, an exercise vegan (unfortunately), a windows vegan, ... just not actual vegan.

    I feel like thats a bad way to use the word vegan.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 32 points 1 year ago

    Shitty click baity title

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I don't use it because I have no trust in it.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 29 points 1 year ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    We let environmentalism become an individual issue, and that was a mistake. Can we not do this for AI? It's a society-wide problem, not something you can solve by measuring your own personal AI footprint.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    No, I didn’t make it up. Although I rather wish I did, because it’s quite catchy, isn’t it?

    No, it isn't, it's fucking stupid. The author was kind enough to link the source of that shitty idea, and the AI/vegan parallels are, per said article: ethical, environmental and wellness concerns.

    Gee wiz, I sure never saw people with those 3 concerns in regards to anything other than veganism!!!

    /s

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 26 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Nothing wrong with being a Luddite

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago

    It was always about worker's rights anyways:

    Malcolm L. Thomas argued in his 1970 history The Luddites that machine-breaking was one of the very few tactics that workers could use to increase pressure on employers, undermine lower-paid competing workers, and create solidarity among workers. "These attacks on machines did not imply any necessary hostility to machinery as such; machinery was just a conveniently exposed target against which an attack could be made."[10] Historian Eric Hobsbawm has called their machine wrecking "collective bargaining by riot", which had been a tactic used in Britain since the Restoration because manufactories were scattered throughout the country, and that made it impractical to hold large-scale strikes.[13][14] An agricultural variant of Luddism occurred during the widespread Swing Riots of 1830 in southern and eastern England, centring on breaking threshing machines.[15]

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luddite

    It was about making sure that as mechanization resulted in a lower need for labor, that workers compensation remained steady, and they worked less hours.

    People hating luddites is just the result of centuries old propaganda from the wealthy

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

    So I'm not the only one who refuses to touch it?

    Around me and everywhere it's getting insane that it feels like there's literally no one who hasn't used it or use regularly for all kinds of shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    We don't need to invent new terms, like 'AI Vegan', when we have a perfectly good term already: Butlerian Jihadist.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago

    'AI vegan'....

    Where I come from, saying something that stupid will get you killed.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›