you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 41 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I refuse to use it because it's shit.

We are not the same.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yup, these things are still garbage for >90% of all applications people are jamming them into. Breathed a sigh of relief when my company CEO said he doesn't see us using AI for more than can center routing for at least the next several years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Works relatively well for image editing

    Else yea I would agree, sometimes it's just shoved for nothing, but 90% seems like too much

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Don't misunderstand, LLM's are fantastic for certain applications and it makes sense to use them. But seriously GTFO my email and search results. Generated speech? Ew. Generated videos? Nah. Ordering for me at a restaurant? Just kill me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    Brave's AI search results are pretty good

    I don’t dislike AI generated videos as long as they are funny with some meta (making fun of the absurdity of what characters do for example - the brainrot potential is unlimited)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Every last bit of it? What is your stance on use of AI for tasks such as data analysis of massive sets for scientific research, or procedural automation of massive operations?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    AI doesn't exist, machine learning algorithms can be useful and are used with no controversy, generative bullshit is basically useless.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You're using a lot of very loosely defined terms with a lot of certainty. Machine learning is AI, we just usually apply it to the more simple versions of it. Where do you personally draw the line? I fully understand the plethora of risks, downsides, and injustices that can potentially be involved in the matter, but I legitimately don't understand the extremist level hatred that some people express to anything that could hold the title of AI. To me, it parallels with someone saying that they hate ionizing radiation. Frequently, it's also bad, and your entirely reasonable to try and avoid it on a daily basis, but it also has many uses that are beneficial and life-saving.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago*

    Same thinking as people who hate crypto for a part of it

    They just sound completely dumb, yet it's the majority of people here

    For a place that welcomes people, inclusivity and hate discrimination, there's a lot of generalization of a lot of topics

  • source
  • parent