Subsequently TIL chocolate is a salad.

all 27 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 51 points 1 year ago

You are free to interpret the nature of rice however you wish.

This was the most zen thing I've ever read.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Pretty sure we’re actually donuts which is an entirely overlooked topology here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    So are you telling me that if I bake a pie, it is type 5 or 6, but as soon as I cut it it becomes type 1 or 3? This doesn't seem right.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Cutting it to serve or eat, doesn't change it's classification.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It clearly does. I point you to number 3, tacos, in the original link. Where it classifies "Slice if pie" as a taco. Clearly being sliced gives it it's class.

    This is also true of hot dogs, where if you didn't slice the bun it would be class 1.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Slicing the hot dog bun is a standard part of it's preparation and presentation. Not really part of this.

    And if you were presented a "Slice of pie" as A thing. It would in fact be a Taco.
    However If you were presented a whole pie and decided to slice it to eat it. "The Pie" would still be a 5 or 6. "The Slice" would be a 3. "The Pie" didn't change by having a slice removed.

    Does that distinction make sense? "A Pie" is one thing. "A Slice of Pie" is a different thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    That slice of pie is clearly in the wrong category

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Fair points, but they did not release a scientific paper like the people who came up qith the salad sandwich soup theory did:

    https://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.16580

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 year ago

    Section three is literally a reference entirely devoted to the cube rule and its incorporation with the thesis of the paper. Its how they determine the carbohydrate enclosure axis on the main graph.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    I have no notes 👏

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    I have started, and ended, many bar chats over this. I am a firm believer in the cube rule above all other starch based food classification systems.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I guess I have to agree because it supports what I've said all along: pie is the best food.

    Pie transcends cubic barriers. It cannot be constrained to merely one construct.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    What's a salad with croutons?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I will not respect their taxonomy because of their examples: "Sushi" as a class contains zero examples of sushi. Meanwhile there is an example of sushi in the "Toast" class.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Today I realized pig in a blanket is because it's pork.

  • source
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago