62
I love how the US, who hasn't been able to build a single high speed rail line over 300 km/h, thinks they can pull off a maglev line. (archive.ph)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/genzedong@lemmygrad.ml
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Buying the tech from Japan isn't gonna solve the fact that you don't even know how to manage a normal passenger rail line, buddy!

Also I know this is technically a Japanese news site reporting from their perspective, but the US is still seriously considering this on their end, just like how they've been considering it since Japan first introduced the SCMaglev prototype decades ago.

all 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 20 points 3 years ago

The US is a rich country and can easily attract talent if they actually want to.

They can build High speed railway if they want to but there's no political will and American culture has been conditioned to hate public facilities.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 8 points 3 years ago

    It takes 4 hours to take Amtrak between NYC and DC. The same amount of time as it takes to drive, which costs a fraction of the money. I would believe that someone made an economical flying car before I'd believe the US suddenly has a working maglev line between two major cities.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 6 points 3 years ago*

    You and I both know that is never going to happen.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 4 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Im not an expert but why do they want to build it 70% underground? Isnt that way more expensive?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    The northeast corridor is densely populated and fast trains require very straight tracks. In a place like China, eminent domain is easier and the State can expropriate land for the construction of a straight track, but in the US this is harder due to higher costs (lower economies of scale) and endless bureaucracy for infrastructure projects. So I suppose they just found it easier and a better option to build a lot underground.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

    I wonder if it has something to do with surface exposure to magnetic fields. A very strong magnetic field, enough to levitate a train, zipping by you at the speed of said train, while not harmful to human biology unlike a lot of fear mongerers claim, can interfere with radio antennas and the navigation systems on ships and aircraft. The inside of the train is heavily shielded but I imagine it's pretty much impossible to prevent it from escaping into the outside without containing the entire track in shielding.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    how to manage a normal passenger rail line

    Management is indeed a different issue from building. Germany builds (or at least used to build) passenger trains - Siemens worked in conjunction with Russian railway and underground to create trains currently running in and around Moscow.

    But ask any German about the Bahn and you'll see steam coming out of their noses.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    Can anyone access archive.ph? I always get this message:

    don't tell me it's blocked 😩

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    look at the hawaii rail, its small and very basic but its been going for decades and is currently costing us around 10 billion and rising

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •