top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 189 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Why waste time like this? Wouldn't it be better if cinemas would use vertical screens where a popular youtuber would describe the plot of the movie in like 30 seconds while talking at 2x speed?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 1 year ago*

    *an AI describes part of a scene in a movie, badly.

    And the title is something like “HE USES SUPERPOWERS TO SAVE HIS FRIEND #MOVIE #FILM #CINEMA #SHORTS”. Also, the name of the channel is any two word combination of: movie, cinema, star, summary, domain or reels. And each upload is either 15 to 25 minutes or a short and the channel uploads something every day.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 148 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    And also add a subway surfer with family guy funny Momentes for the ultimate goldfish experience

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    And a live comment section. Or even synced commentary streams by YouTubers you can view on your phone via their Wi-Fi? You're paying to see the movie anyway, so they won't be limited by fair use.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 101 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Look, I am the type who watches lectures at 1.25x or 1.5x speed or something. But movies? It'd ruin the pacing. If you can't bring up the attention to watch a movie then maybe you just shouldn't

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 77 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Why waste time watching an entire movie when you can just read the spoilers and know what's it about in less than 5 minutes?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Theaters and opera, too. I'm sure the actors will be willing to get their shifts cut by 20-50 % if we help them negotiate the same pay per performance.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    If you look at old silent movies, they were played at different speeds in different cinemas and projections. There wasn't a standard way to play a movie, no "you NEED to play the movie at this specific speed or it will be ruined". I'm not saying the same should apply to modern movies, but I find it interesting.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    That is not true. There was a standard, which is different from todays standard. Which is why it looks funny being played at todays standard, but mostly they get digitally fixed and they look completely natural now.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I imagine in a few decades we might have AI media. You could read a web novel with a fewer or a lot of pictures, or read it as a manhwa / webtoon, or as an anime, or as a virtual reality 3D experience that is semi-interactive. And you could give instructions to shorten or expand it, or even diverge in the plot a little, or change the characters. More like the holodeck with a VR headset.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The industrial revolution and it's consequences....

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I hate watching anything faster than normal. I want bad things to happen to this person.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 22 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I... what? I'm suddenly very happy for David Lynch, that he didn't live long enough to see this catch on...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It hasn't...caught on? People have just stopped going to movies as much, and I don't think 4 concurrent showings of the new Jurassic Park movie at speeds 1x thru 2x are saving them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Does this person not pay for their ticket? It costs 15$ for a ticket at our theater. Why would I want to waste that money by having it sped up? It's hard enough finding movies that are worth watching in the first place.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    The theater here does a half price deal on Tuesdays, two of us can go for like $12.95, it's a great deal.

    Might be worth checking in your area, I've seen a lot more mediocre movies after we started going on Tuesday.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    YouTube added customisable speeds recently!

    I find 1.4 to be enjoyable, but 2x if I need to get through something dense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    I usually watch anime on 2x, but I struggle with other media at that speed, probably cause I can read faster than listen to words in english lol. I do watch videos in my native language faster on the rare occasions I do watch any

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    How much crap are you watching if you have to speed it up to get through it all?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    For obvious reasons this will never happen. That being said, I do the same with most content. When YouTube I use from 1.25 as an absolute minimum to 2.0 a lot of the time. Average being 1.5. For movies/series I tend to opt for 1.25-1.33.

    But this all fails when any music is involved - then I dial it down to 1.0.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    I can kind of understand the people who speed up audiobooks and podcasts. But movies? That's nuts. |

    I wonder if OP was alive during the VCR era. I bet they would have loved the FF button. AKA chipmunk mode.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›