Just around 24 hours after Musk made his comments, more than 42,000 new users joined Bluesky, making it the biggest signup day yet for the currently invite-only platform that launched earlier this year.

Bluesky saw a total of 53,585 new signups by the end of Tuesday, September 19. The new users gained in that single day make up 5 percent of the platform's entire user base of 1,125,499 total accounts.

The new user signups are tracked via the third-party website "Bluesky Stats." Looking over Bluesky signup numbers on the tracker for the past month, it appears that the platform usually sees from 10,000 to 20,000 new signups per day. Bluesky has doubled its usual daily new user numbers already, with many more hours left in the day still to go.

It's impossible to know whether Musk's comments about charging users to post on X really played a role in this, but it almost certainly had some effect.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 164 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Great another social media platform from the same fart huffing dumb asses that sold Twitter... it's like people don't learn lessons.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [+] 143 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)
  • [+] 35 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    masto is fractured even further with different servers arguing in places (a bit like here tbh) over federation.

    And? Servers are inter-operable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Until your home instance defederates from another instance. Sure, you can always make another account, but your average user wants a lower friction experience.

    I'm reasonably active in the fediverse, but I recognize that the more explaining it takes to the average user the less likely they're going to want to join in.

    The old old top gear cool wall tried to hit on this concept. You could have a very technically excellent car classified as uncool because if you had to explain why it was cool to a normie you had already lost them.

    It will be hard for the fediverse to get over this hump, which is probably why you see so many Linux users here and so few say woodworkers or other (somewhat) more niche communities.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago

    Most average people would never notice defederation unless you told them. It's pretty frictionless and drama free.

    The niche communities are always the last to come. It's why they're niche. That techie people are the first is nothing damming. It's always been that way for every service.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 109 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    This is a problem. Bluesky is privately-owned and will do same shit.

    Here are some explainations. And more.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 104 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    isn’t bluesky invite only?

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 79 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    Each current member usually get at least one invite to share biweekly. That’s how they have been growing it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 73 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Google+ did the same thing when it rolled out, then they tried to force people to use it before they cancelled the project.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    In fairness, Gmail had a similar invite system when it launched and that's been way more successful than G+

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Gmail was also both "federated" and an insanely good product compared to its contemporaries. G+ had a couple of interesting innovations, but it wasn't all that special and invite-only on a closed ecosystem is very iffy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (10 replies)
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 72 points 2 years ago (27 children)

    I wonder why people aren’t going for mastodon.

  • source
  • hideshow 30 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Mastadon (and the Fediverse in general, to some extent) has problems with discoverability and the average user finds federation confusing. People tend to either use microblogging to see what's going on with people they're interested in or to broadcast their activities to a large group of people, and Mastadon currently doesn't fit that niche very well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 43 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The same reason people aren't going for Lemmy.

    Aside from the fact that the Fediverse is an incredibly confusing concept to the average user, those same users are entrenched and connected to everyone they already want to be connected to on the same platform. Until they are essentially forced to move, they'll stay on Twitter. The people on Lemmy and Mastodon right now are a tiny but vocal minority compared to the massive userbases of the platforms they abandoned.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Yeah there really needs to be a rethink of how the Fediverse works.

    I don't want to have to subscribe to 8 different "Games" subs each with under 3000 users.

    It really should be like "topics" more than "sublemmys" (or whatever) where every post on the Fediverse tagged "games" will appear on your feed when you subscribe to the topic.

    The topics still get moderated by the local instance topic moderators and instances can defederate from troubled instances, but discoverability would improve exponentially.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (24 replies)
    [–] 62 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I was interested in it but at the end of the day Dorsey got Twitter into its initially mediocre state, and he's endorsed RFK Jr. as well as Musk's purchase of Twitter. So should I really expect it to be any better? I'll keep an eye on it but my expectations aren't terribly high.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 53 points 2 years ago (27 children)

    Excuse me, signups on an INVITE ONLY platform?

  • source
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • load more comments (27 replies)
    [–] 52 points 2 years ago (24 children)

    I firmly believe Elon is trying to run Twitter out of relevancy, or business entirely.

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • load more comments (23 replies)
    [–] 50 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 45 points 2 years ago (21 children)

    Always good to see more people looking into platforms besides Twitter, plenty of great places out there

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • load more comments (21 replies)
    [–] 42 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    People are so desperate for anything RESEMBLING twitter, that they'll sign up for a trash service like BS.

    Mastodon undoubtedly has more brand recognition at this point.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 38 points 2 years ago

    I wouldn't hold my breath, 42k out of 528M is nothing

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago (15 children)

    I'm so glad people are calling Bluesky out for the trash service it is. I just mastodon outlasts this crap and we get more people on there than bluesky

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • load more comments (15 replies)
    [–] 28 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (12 children)

    Who is the target audience for BlueSky? BlueSky's tech isn't as open or developed as the alternatives though, is it?

    Edit:
    Not sure why I asked that first question, answer's obvious, so it was more out of frustration I think. Sort of in a similar way towards people moving to Threads or any other corporate social media again after getting screwed before.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (12 replies)
    [–] 24 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    God I hope he gets gaslit into actually making Twitter a subscription. It would be so funny

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 23 points 2 years ago

    Switch to Mastodon. It's a great alternative.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Strange to measure it against an invite only site, I would love to sign up but I haven’t been able to find invites. I think between Mastodon, Bluesky & Threads via ActivityPub (eventually) will get most of my communities back.

    I love Mastodon & prefer it in many ways but there just aren’t enough people there. The tech & dev community is lively, everything else is essentially non-existent.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Bluesky, the "decentralized" X-alternative social media platform

    "The" alternative platform?? Shots fired.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 53 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›