
post
James 2
14 What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if someone claims to have faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save them? 15 Suppose a brother or a sister is without clothes and daily food. 16 If one of you says to them, “Go in peace; keep warm and well fed,” but does nothing about their physical needs, what good is it? 17 In the same way, faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead.
Matthew 6
5 “And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. 6 But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. 7 And when you pray, do not keep on babbling like pagans, for they think they will be heard because of their many words. 8 Do not be like them, for your Father knows what you need before you ask him.
My brain is just now upon seeing this post processing why right-wingers always accuse the left of virtue signaling; as always with conservatives, it's projection. They virtue signal by wearing crosses while definitely not giving a hoot about the teachings of Jesus.
They can't imagine someone sincerely supporting a cause they care about and assume we all only do it for recognition among our peers, because that's the way they use causes. To signal to the in-group that we are one of them.
they dont call it virtue signalling, they call it woke.
Virtue signaling, political correctness, woke, they've used a bunch of terms over the years and I don't doubt they'll eventually move on from woke to another term they use to mock anyone with empathy.
This comment connects the dots so incredibly well compared with what I see from my angry conservative family.
They can't imagine someone sincerely supporting a cause they care about and assume we all only do it for recognition among our peers, because that's the way they use causes. To signal to the in-group that we are one of them.
Fuuuck, that is exactly the mindset I was raised to have, and which I very much had during my angry teenage years. Fortunately that was a long-ass time ago and in the decades since I’ve had everything from college to the internet to let me consider the thoughts and arguments of other less angry/hateful/bigoted/sociopathic people.
My parents are pretty hippy-dippy granola types who have regularly volunteered for our local Green Party, so I'm obviously coming at this from a different perspective than you. I like to think I'd have ended up at the same conclusions I have even if I grew up with super conservative parents, but I'd probably be pretty different.
So props to you for doing the hard work of detaching yourself from those mindsets. Of course, we all absorb some bullshit through society at large (heck I even remember, when I was just a kid, my dad making occasional "jokes" about how Indigenous people here in Canada "were lazy and got everything for free". And my dad is rather progressive for his peer group).
But I can only imagine it must be so much harder to detach yourself from that if your family is completely immersed into the kind of rhetoric the right has been pushing for years now.
I guess I'm kind of getting rude here, but why do all the women get evil looking and hardened once they work for the trump administration? It's not age but like Cruella type stuff.
It’s a phenomenon called Mar-A-Lago Face.
They were hired for it the same way you never see a fat woman working at a bar where the waitresses wear a skimpy outfit. They are hiring disney villains.
It's not just Trump. People age in every single administration. You're the head of a mafia, the Yankee cartel. Like, it's probably stressful regardless if you have good or bad intentions.
Religion is the true cancer of society. MAGA is the side effects of that cancer. Makes sense because most MAGA are highly religious.
Any ideology raised to fanatism is dangerous. Tankies are usually atheists
i disagree. i think spirituality can be amazing and make life and good values even more complete.
i see issues in hierarchies, domination, and hate. not all religion but probably all dominat religion.
Seriously I have come to find blonde women grossly unattractive and its because of Fox News and this motherfucker.
I found that one pissed off rant from a Young Turks journalist where’s she’s angrily saying “I DONT CARE WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS” to be very attractive. I literally know nothing else about her and she could be a horrible person, but that moment of righteous indignation really had an effect on me
Untrue. Christianity is self-proclaimed. This "real Christian" bullshit is apologetic nonsense, just like "the devil made fossils."
As an atheist raised roman catholic, I disagree.
There are rules and tenets and ideals of the religion. It's not about meeting them, but it is about wanting to and more strictly attempting to.
It's not even a no true Scotsman fallacy, because there's a book no flavor of Christianity I know of openly rejects while claiming to be Christian, even if they have adendums like the book of Mormon. The rules are defined.
They aren't only not trying to live up to those rules and ideals, they aren't only just paying them lip service, they are actively, jubilantly, and studiously undermining and working against the most belabored edicts of their belief system without end and calling that Christianity.
Cheering for the torture of the meek, demanding cruelty upon people from foreign lands and calling oneself Christian, ie Jesus of Nazareth as written in the New Testament, is like claiming to be an academic because you burn a book every morning and brag about how illiterate you are.
"What you have to know how to read and... read books instead of burning them to be an academic?" Actually yes.
You're looking in the wrong direction. Inconsistency in religion is the name of the game. No base to stand on in the fucking Bible. Look in the direction of sociology, and on your way, take a peek at Buddhist theories of mind. The Buddha was a real philosopher whose system is partially used today everywhere in psychology. Christianity popped up in an area dominated by Western philosophy, and it's valuable to take a look at what the East had going on.
It makes sense if she means to diss people with tattoos.
She says "can turn" in comparison to "doesn't". That comparison is not balanced.
I thought this was a quote.
As an observation, it is literally right. There is 'Christian' as a path of spiriitual growth and 'Christian' as a gang. That golden cross is a gang symbol and works as such. Spiritually it would be wooden. Golden, it shows membership of the Christian gang.
Tattoos work in the same way. Japanese know and treat them accordingly. At the very least tattoos of normal people make gang membership less despicable. If everybody marks themselves as non-normal, society changes.
This is not an argument against tattoos. They are just more than a fashion symbol, while those can already be spiritually influential, as many women on diets can attest.
I'd say it's a choice as to what the symbol communicates.
A tattoo that is art or fun creative is awesome.
A cross, be it tattoo or necklace... Just means you promote one of humanities biggest and oldest lies.

top 50 comments