all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 73 points 1 year ago (4 children)

After you’re in the field for long enough, you start to realise that the structure and flaws in the application mimic the structure and flaws of the reporting structure of the organisation

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Yeh. Matrix structure where anyone can message anyone, and lots of people depend on each other, seems to work pretty well. But silos will develop anywhere you've got hundreds of people, at least as far as I've seen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I've also witnessed matrix structure break down when too many methods of communication are used. It's all very brittle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • I've seen matrixed organizations (re)build themselves to Agile (multi-disciplinary) ad-hoc teams, where there are clearly some such teams that wildly outperform the others. Basically you just hope and pray you're plugged into one of the good ones. Meanwhile none of the lower-tier managers have any real control over workflow, workload, or what anyone is actually doing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 39 points 1 year ago

    That tech debt graph in the background is the best thing I have ever seen.

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I'm going to pronounce it "agilé" at the next stand up and see who corrects me.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I don’t see how it is a joke tbh. Thought that was one common interpretation of said law.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment