all 17 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 87 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Sorry boss my copilot requires a nap and a snack to continue.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 38 points 2 years ago

    When I switch copilot to a reasoning model like o1, and am working through some really annoying bug I'll often get rate limited.

    But the rate limiting is per model, so I can switch over to say the Claude model, and then use that til I'm rate limited, then switch to another.

    Pretty much literally having to give each LLM a nap and only play with one at a time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 55 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    Did anyone else read it as "vi bing" at first?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] 45 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Yes. (n)vi(m) > Emacs, and Bing >= Google. So it should be vi SearxNG

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago*

    Used to be: "the code is compiling"

    Now it is: "the AI model is training"

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Dammit this timeline sucks.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Right? We got two opinions on genAI among our non techs:

    • "genIA is a joke and cannot replace human creation."
    • "Are our programmers writing all the codes instantaneously with genAI yet? Our competitive edge is at stake! O the productivity!"

    There’s definitely an opening there, but it’s an uphill battle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • the only ai with rights is the dragon in sam n max hit the road

  • source