cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/18210719

Archived

Facebook is banning posts that mention various Linux-related topics, sites, or groups. Some users may also see their accounts locked or limited when posting Linux topics. Major open-source operating system news, reviews, and discussion site DistroWatch is at the center of the controversy, as it seems to be the first to have noticed that Facebook's Community Standards had blackballed it.

[...]

DistroWatch says that the Facebook ban took effect on January 19. Readers have reported difficulty posting links to the site on this social media platform. Moreover, some have told DistroWatch that their Facebook accounts have been locked or limited after sharing posts mentioning Linux topics.

If you're wondering if there might be something specific to DistroWatch.com, something on the site that the owners/operators perhaps don't even know about, for example, then it seems pretty safe to rule out such a possibility. Reports show that "multiple groups associated with Linux and Linux discussions have either been shut down or had many of their posts removed." However, we tested a few other Facebook posts with mentions of Linux, and they didn't get blocked immediately.

[...]

Addition to include the DistroWatch link: https://distrowatch.com/weekly-mobile.php?issue=20250127#sitenews

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 127 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

Did not expect “Linux users” to be this early in the stanzas of “First they came for the […]”

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I mean, Linux literally runs the world, so if this is the best he can do, not even my bunny slippers are gonna be spooked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 114 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    I assume Facebook runs on Linux, as does the rest of the internet?

    I wish Linux distros use a license that prevents this nonsense.

    (I know including ethics in a license is a bad idea, but still...)

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 87 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    “Linux for me, not for thee”

    They need the serfs to be hapless surveillance targets, not power users with technological agency.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 81 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

    My conspiracy theory: Meta has an AI that scans articles/the internet for threats and then adjusts the filters for Facebook. The AI just read the story that some Games companies are blocking Linux clients, because they see them as unsafe. The AI just copied what it read.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I agree. It's like Occam's Razor, but with stupidity instead of simplicity: the most stupid reason is the most likely.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Macco's Razor. The stupidest possible explanation is probably the right answer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Schrodinger's Razor:

    The answer is both really smart and really stupid, but you won't know which until you look at the source.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 64 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 54 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    I wonder if microsoft asked them to do this, either way this is something that shouldnt be ignored. Its basically direct attack and their endgoal might be to make regular people hate or fear linux. That in turn could be used to influence laws and try to ban or limit linux to corporate use only. Computers have become so integral part of society that by controlling the operating system you control the people.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I don't think it was Microsoft, in the past few years they've been being a little chill towards Linux.

    As for being an attack, even if they wanted to, they couldn't get rid of Linux. Even the US government can't tell people to stop using it. I mean, they can tell people to stop, but there's no practical way for them to enforce such a law. Most distros out there also distribute via torrent, so even if you took down the websites for all the distros, you couldn't stop the distribution of the ISOs. Not to mention, if they outlawed or restricted Linux, I can't think of anything that would absolutely make the Linux users become very rebellious. Imagine the majority of the hackers, white, gray, and black hat, all of a sudden becoming very angry with the US government. It would be absolute chaos.

    Not to mention, there are corporations like Valve and Ubuntu that have invested millions into Linux. I don't believe for a second they would just lay down and not fight the government outlawing something that has become very lucrative for them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    yeah, i hope i'm just overthinking. Its just that linux is basically only true freedom we have what comes to operating systems. Maybe they just want to keep people who dont know that much about computers away from linux. Though that should be opposed just as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I will dig out my old tails drive just out of spite if they do that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago*

    it shouldnt be allowed to go there because it might not be reversable by then. I wish I was just paranoid but way the world is going makes this very plausible.

    By the time things like that become evident its like trying to stop a boulder that has been gaining momentum for a while, which is why I wish people were more active about doing something instead of waiting until there is clear evidence that something should be done. This kind of wasnt a direct reply to content of your comment, sorry

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 45 points 2 years ago*

    https://www.axios.com/2025/01/10/mark-zuckerberg-joe-rogan-facebook-censorship-biden

    Zuckerberg on Rogan: Facebook's censorship was "something out of 1984"

    "It really is a slippery slope, and it just got to a point where it's just, OK, this is destroying so much trust, especially in the United States, to have this program."

    He said he was "worried" from the beginning about "becoming this sort of decider of what is true in the world." Zuckerberg praised X's "community notes" program as superior to Facebook's model.

    Way to tackle censorship, Zuck…

    The irony is Facebook is a major contributor to a lot of open source software, and Zuckerberg in particular publicly praised the "open" approach of Llama and some other projects. Buts it’s clearly all just self serving, huh?

  • source
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    We've been on the receiving end of attention like this from Microsoft for longer than Facebook has been a thing, if Zuck thinks this is gonna make a dent in things, he's mistaken.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Remember the first time I read about Linux (long time ago) and they were basically calling it a communist os (not even joking) first site on Google at the time was all about how it was unpatriotic to use it etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    a communist os

    That's exactly what it is

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Probably not in the sense that the average American uses the word "communist", which is more about their remembered history of authoritarian regimes of the USSR and mid 20th century China and those sorts. Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot, and the atrocities thereof.

    Linux is communist insofar as it is open source, and therefore less affected or tied up in capitalistic practices. Capitalists still use and contribute to Linux, but often those contributions go back into the commons of the open source code.

    You probably know all that, I'm just feeling long winded.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 29 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Are there really that many Linux users discussing on Facebook? My brothers in Open Source, there are much better places even without this ban…

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 28 points 2 years ago

    This is the first shot

    Even though almost every big tech company uses Linux on the backend they don't want you to use it.

    Think of Peacock not letting people running Linux be able to use their application.

    It's free and open source, and the powers to be don't want anybody to have that.

    You can do what you want with it if you are willing to learn about it. Governments don't like that.

    I may be wrong, but I see more of this coming.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I just can't believe. wth?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago*

    I am reminded about the catchphrase for GrayJay: Follow Creators, Not Platforms

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I mean they are not wrong, Linux is a very big threat of good cyber security which makes it harder for them to collect information. I am not at all surprised that Facebook views cyber security practices as a threat( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    My initial instinct is that it's not about security (obviously), but the beginning of the attack of FOSS, since China dunked on everyone with their AI model, that can now be used by anyone freely while performing similarly (with the appropriate resources) rather than the ever-growing product making you pay for their useless snake oil.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    You're definitely onto something. This isn't the first time corporations have targeted FOSS, but because Linux is gaining in popularity we're starting to see the old FUD and EEE tactics come back into play.

    Once we start seeing more normal people using it, primarily women, we'll also see tons of misinformation that exists to sow the seeds of doubt in their minds.

    Probably something like the old "mac vs. PC" commercials but with "windows vs. linux"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Weird and shitty, but who gives a fuck about Facebook?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Everyone over the age of 45 and is not tech inclined

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago

    How many reasons do they have to give you before you walk away from facebook?

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Sure but those links to sketchy .apk games of which the ad for them involves rape or kidnapping usually are a-okay

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 11 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Who hurt Facebook? This must be some unintended issue or else what do they have to do with Linux? Facebook has 0 reasons to do it

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
    [–] 6 points 2 years ago*

    Go and read original Distrowatch post and tell me this doesn’t sound like a plausible and way more boring explanation.

    • There is an ongoing US-China trade war that started 2 presidents ago.
    • Mark Zuckerberg wants to fellatio Donald Trump (hence dropping pretence of social responsibility).
    • Mark Zuckerberg wants to participate in this trade war somehow so he bans mentions of Chinese tech.
    • Distrowatch mentions OpenKylin, a Chinese Linux distribution, gets flagged.
    • Facebook support (person making around $3.5 per month in some third world country) doesn’t know difference between specific Linux distro and Linux itself, tells Distrowatch that Linux is now banned.
    • Distrowatch doesn’t research anything and cries foul without second thought because Meta is evil.
    • We live in everyone is dumb timeline.
  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›