top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 106 points 3 years ago (16 children)

The good thing about this is that I will never attract these guys.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 70 points 3 years ago (9 children)
  • [–] 53 points 3 years ago (7 children)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 18 points 3 years ago* (5 children)

    Oh no your lack of belief in my actractiveness to you has made me attracted to you.

    What do you do?

    1. Roll a d20 this is a DnD scenario now.

    2. Ew, well I am not attracted to you, internet stranger.

    3. Wait, what if you were a woman? That would be less icky.

    4. Ugh comments like this prove humanity has gone backward.

    I am bored all of these are acceptable answers...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 78 points 3 years ago* (11 children)

    This is satire, right?

    right?

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 60 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    You could present those guys with a supermodel or the fucking platonic ideal of a woman and they would go "that's 7.1 at most, stop overrating"

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (3 children)

    they have a point

    clearly cute nerdy girls with glasses or tomboys are superior smh 😤😤.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I don't care if it's knitting or being a tank mechanic, a girl nerding out over her interests is hella cute.

    Or anyone else, for that matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 59 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    MFers out here rating women like they're dogs at fucking crufts

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Didn't she post the picture and asked people to rate her?

    I agree that it's ridiculous and insane but if she asked for being superficially rated and she gets that.... You really can't blame the guys rating her.

    Almost everyone is uglier than this girl anyway. If she is a 7, we are 3. :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 3 years ago

    why did you have to expose me to this nonsense

  • source
  • [–] 40 points 3 years ago
    [+] 33 points 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 32 points 3 years ago* (6 children)

    No way, please tell me that subreddit is satire 😱

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    nah unfortunately it's a safe space for incels

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Is that why the text they wrote was so disturbing to read? Have they lived in an echo chamber for so long that they think it’s okay to talk about a person like they’re a cadaver. F’ing creepy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    On one hand, rating peoples' appearance is the whole point of that subreddit, but on the other hand... My God, do these guys have a talent for making it disgustingly creepy.

    I wouldn't even expect actual cosmetic surgeons to talk like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 31 points 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 30 points 3 years ago (23 children)

    What do you have to look like to achieve more than a 7? A biblically accurate angel?

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago

    Too many eyes but not fat or disfigured. 4/10.

    The whole thing is designed to allow them to call people (especially women) "mid". They arbitrarily chose to use a gaussian distribution pattern so they had an excuse not to give anyone a score beyond 6s.

    But real answer is be a hugely successful fashion model who the sub creator found attractive. Then their "objective rating standards" would include arbitrary criteria to bundle your face in. The whole sub could be replaced with a trivial ML model if it were actually about just giving their "objective" ratings. The internal weights used by the ML model would make about as much sense as the crap spouted in the screenshot.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (20 replies)
    [–] 23 points 3 years ago

    oh yeah this is why im sapphic

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 3 years ago

    this is actually insanity...

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 3 years ago

    Idk she’d be prettier if she talked to a therapist about her insecurity in her appearance

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 3 years ago

    I know most Lemmy user's have a hate boner for Reddit for many other reasons than this, but IMO all of the /r/AmIUgly, /r/AmISexy, /r/rateme, and other rating subreddits are an absolute cancer on the site.

    90% of posts are from new accounts with questionable verification methods, with the others being people trying to shill their OF profiles. I can accept that, but what really boils my piss is that almost all of the comments follow this pattern:

    • Slating anyone remotely attractive for being attention seeking, or posting incorrectly on a sub "intended for ugly people", all while that person only comments on the attractive people.
    • Obvious negging, as if giving some super attractive girl a 6/10 is going to make them jump into their DM's and ask "what can I do to be better for you sempai?"
    • The inevitable stalking of their account, attempt to give into their DM's, or reverse image search that ends up with a post on these subs gaining you 100 new IG followers and some thirsty cunts liking and commenting on your pics.
    • Toxic behaviour when someone tries to actually be nice, or to offer some friendly advice. If I had a penny for every time a woman commented on a post on those subs with some advice, only for some guy to shit on them and say "lol no they need to go to the gym"

    Obviously, these subs are going to exist, but they just make me end up hating people, because it's always the same pattern.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 3 years ago

    Dudes out here comparing phrenology notes like that shit still valid.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 3 years ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 14 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I'm giving her a 11 out of 10

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›