top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 94 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Boy howdy, I sure can't wait for 99.9% of all manufacturers on Earth to completely ignore this as well, and keep selling devices and cables that are completely unlabeled.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    But what about my shiny Certified USB 3.2 Gen1x2 Legendary SS+?

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Does shiny mean it's gold-plated? :⁠-⁠)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (5 children)
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I'm using a printer cable from 2006 to send audio out to my DAC. Sounds pretty fucking good.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Thank fuck, a simple and clear marking that an average user can understand! I assume displayport compatible ports will still have that symbol, which is fine. Soon I'll be and to price out laptops that will work with a docking station without needing to read the damn manuals!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 37 points 2 years ago (8 children)
  • [–] 80 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

    It's actually different and better as the previous naming scheme was actually horrendous (trying to explain it to customers was a nightmare).

    Cause previously if you wanted to figure out what speed of USB port you were getting you'd have to look up the table because me telling you that a port was USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 doesn't tell you jack shit.

    Can you see how cursed this is for non-tech savvy people? Absolutely terrible.

    Thankfully now the new naming scheme will be:
    USB +

    • 5 Gbps
    • 10 Gbps
    • 20 Gbps
    • 40 Gbps

    So the xkcd meme actually isn't relevant here.

    Edit:
    Revised grammar in the first sentence

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 34 points 2 years ago

    The only thing changing here is the way cables are going to be labeled, the tech itself is staying exactly the same.

    And on top of that, the author was generally correct for most situations, but usb (and especially usb c) truly has replaced a ton of separate connectors with a single standard. And it's very likely to continue to replace even more as time goes on

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 24 points 2 years ago

    General rule:

    The longer the product's name, the more bullshit you get.

    USB 3.2 Gen 2x2

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (1 child)
    [–] 12 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    We're adding new, different symbols to the confusing mess of old symbols and keeping both? Neat!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    There are too many standards. Let’s make a new one so we can consolidate them all.

    There are now N + 1 standards.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    I'm still trying to find a good beard trimmer and electric toothbrush that charge with USB-C.

    These are the only gadgets i have left that aren't charged with USB-C.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    Fucking finally

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago* (9 children)

    What is high-speed USB suppose to be? No speed just for charging?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    From what I recall high-speed USB was USB 2.0, mostly that is used today for stuff like mice or keyboards where speed isn't really all that relevant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    High-speed is actually low-speed, got it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    90% of USB cables are 480Mbps and it's not even included. This will be useless.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    That would be USB 2.0 and is pretty safe to assume that all USB ports and cables support this (If you can find a USB 1.0 or 1.1 port I'll be impressed). Why bother with a 480Mbps logo if it's the default minimum?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    No thanks. I'll wait for USB to develop their own writing and language first. They will get there one day.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    I thought the G number meant how many Gb’s I could store in the cable

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Isn’t that naming like a few years old? I already have a cable with 40 gbps 240 W on it

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    Yes. They broke the news on this branding guidelines change in 2022.

    It's unclear why it's making the headlines again now - perhaps they started enforcing it somehow (although I'm unsure how that would even work) at the beginning of the year?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    Usually what's called simpler as opposed to techy ways makes things, in fact, loads of crap more complex.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Couldn't give a fuck about speed labelling, how about wattage?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Well, it took like 10 years to get this far sooo probably sometime around 2038

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    We still don't have Bluetooth with stereo audio and mic channel at the same time... it's either stereo audio, or mono audio + mic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Ah, is that why my headphones sound all weird for a second when a call comes in and the audio hasn't paused yet?

    Think of the number of times you've needed your phone to be waterproof versus the number of times you could have plugged in a decent pair of headphones and not had Bluetooth introduce lag and mono audio.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›