top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 79 points 3 years ago (15 children)

It's not that radical, we lived with less than this for tens of thousands of years before the industrial revolution.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 3 years ago (13 children)

    This sounds nice for someone in a developed country who has all they need, and is only satisfying their wants. But for most of the world, economic development is a necessity and a lifesaver. Child mortality is reduced, life expectancy and education level increased, child labor decreased, as a country's economy grows. This is not a fringe right-wing idea. This is the very real effect of economic growth in developing countries, i.e. most of the world.

    Degrowthers often seem to forget that applying their ideas will literally kill millions in developing countries, by preventing the economic developments that would have saved them.

    FWIW, I am not a fan of unbridled capitalism either but think that it is important to consider science in important matters like this and not just go with gut feeling. That applies to both fascism and degrowth.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 55 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    The article is, in my opinion, purposely mischaracterizing the degrowth movement. I would say degrowth is more a natural reaction to the excesses of capitalism than movement about addressing climate change.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 45 points 3 years ago (20 children)

    How about we do two things

    Like how about we work less and we immediately and totally nationalize energy and agriculture haha just a thought haha (fireflies are going extinct haha)

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • load more comments (14 replies)
    [–] 34 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    This will go the same way the "Green New Deal" did. It will scare the ruling class, the ruling class will send its media minions to demonize it, and nothing will change. doomer

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 32 points 3 years ago (19 children)

    Protip: if you want your movement to gain any political traction, don't call it the degrowth movement

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 28 points 3 years ago* (7 children)

    In order to slow the economy down and not wreak havoc, he said, we have to reconfigure our ideas about the entire economic system.

    This is how degrowthers envision the process: After a reduction in material and energy consumption, which will constrict the economy, there should also be a redistribution of existing wealth, and a transition from a materialistic society to one in which the values are based on simpler lifestyles and unpaid work and activities.

    Sounds good to me. It is a fair point that the basic operation of our society depends on continual growth, but redistribution seems like it would be an effective way of mitigating those problems degrowth might cause. We have more than enough resources to keep everyone alive, we just have to use them.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I'd rather just do the full communism now path, where once every man, woman and child has all their needs and many of their wants met, there isn't a desire to chase the next fashion craze, or buy the next iphone or "keep up with the jones'" as it were because the Jones' have the same stuff you do, but maybe they spend their ample leisure time exercising, you spend your time gardening.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [+] 20 points 3 years ago (3 children)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    [+] 14 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)
    [–] 14 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    Degrowth is such a fucking stupid idea. What we need is socialism. The demonic oligarchs that run the world are never going to prioritize reducing climate change. They've made that clear over the last century. There's too much profit to be made.

    Worker owned means of production is the only solution. Only then can we direct the productive forces toward solving the most immediate problems that humanity faces. We've created so much productivity, but we need to guide it in the direction of sustainability instead of the profit motive.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 13 points 3 years ago

    "Turn on, tune in, drop out" 2.0

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago

    Yes, we'll save ourselves by resetting the clock and never undoing the conditions that led to where we are

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago*

    From the narrowly focused aspect of clothing, what can we do? Repair. Repair your clothes. Don’t throw away a ripped shirt, don’t replace it with a flimsy new shirt made by underpaid workers. Sew it. Patch it. Check your library for books about mending, go to YouTube and seek out basic repair videos. A packet of needles, a thimble, a spool of black thread, and a spool of white thread will take care of the majority of repairs. What you can’t do yourself can be handled by your neighborhood laundry or dry cleaner.

    Practice radical repairing. Mend your way to a better world.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›