So the richest man in the world spent $130 million to elect Donald Trump.

Now he's being put in charge of a "government efficiency" agency while controlling corporations with billions in government contracts that are also under federal investigations.

See how this works?

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 108 points 2 years ago (29 children)

If you live in Europe and think your democratic system is resistant to these things: it's not.

Don't wait until your version of Trump gets elected. Start organizing now.

  • source
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago*

    Absolutely, over here we’ve recently elected a horrible party as the biggest one, with 25% of the votes. Dark times.

    The difference is that in many European countries the head of state is more of a ceremonial position (at least in practice) and the head of the government holds nowhere near the amount of power a US president does. With proportional representation, the biggest party often doesn’t have an absolute majority and needs to form a government together with other parties, or might even end up in the opposition. Together they agree on who’s going to be the head of government (usually the head of the largest party), who will be the ministers and what will be the policy. If it doesn’t work out because of disagreements, the government breaks up and new elections will be held.

    My point is: the risk is real, populism is growing, policy is shifting, but the dynamics are different. Having a first past the post system and concentrating so much power into a single political position feels like an accelerator.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (20 replies)
    [–] 87 points 2 years ago

    This is fascism 101.

    Fascism is at least as much an economic system as a political one, or more precisely, it's more like an economic system hiding behind a political system.

    And the way the economic system works is very simple - private ownership of the means of production combined with an overt and institutionalized revolving door between business and government, so that the end result is plutocratic oligarchy.

    Basically, it's taking the system that already existed in the US, by which the wealthy bought access to political power mostly surreptitiously and nominally illegally unless they followed specific restrictions, and legitimizes and formalizes and institutionalizes it and moves it right out into the open.

    And behind all of the white supremacist and christian nationalist and reactionary conservative rhetoric, this was always the real goal.

  • source
  • [–] 60 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    If the numbers are true it costed him less than 0.1% of his wealth which is surprising how little it takes. Would you spend 0.1% of your wealth to elect a President and gain a government post that will bring you more wealth? Would you spend 1% of your wealth to become insanely rich? 10%?

    In the society where power is measured by wealth ultra rich should not exist. Or better such society should not exist.

    Also Musk wasn't even the biggest donor. And Harris was okay with this whole thing, she also received enormous donations. Who was against ultra rich? Bernie Sanders. No wonder he was sacked despite popular support.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 31 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Speedrunning the decline and fall of the Roman empire.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago

    What an absolute treasure Robert and Sam Reich are.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago

    He also spent 44 billion buying twitter to disrupt and control the conversations happening there as part of his efforts, and now the the government essentially has a data mining tool and propaganda machine without actually 'owning' it.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Any of those 2a weirdos gonna show us what 2a is for or not?

    I see a lot of domestic enemies around and suddenly the obese, insanely loud dipshits aren't making a peep.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Turns out it really is all a big club and we didn't get invited.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    I wish I had a schilling

    for every senseless killing

    I'd buy a government

    America's for sale

    And you can get a good deal on it

    And make a healthy profit

    Or maybe tear it apart

    Start with assumption

    That a million people are smart

    Smarter than one

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    yes for him the USA is just a high return investment and livelihoods of the US citizens are just expandibles.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    Just capitalism taken to the logical conclusion. This term implies there's some form of capitalism in which this doesn't happen. There is not.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    I guess technically he spent $44.13 billion

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago*

    Now look how much money Kamala received to "buy" the election.

    The Biden—now Harris—campaign committee raised $997.2 million and Trump’s campaign committee raised $388 million in total between Jan. 2023 and Oct. 16, 2024

    woops

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    I mean, yeah, but they'd be in a better position to make that argument if they hadn't been campaigning with Mark Cuban. (Not that Robert Reich needs to be told that, but it still needs to be said.)

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›