There's a lot of words there, but not many of them make sense.

I've read that comment five times and I have absolutely no idea what you're trying to say.

I love her Fujitsu postal bug truther stance. It's so wonderfully unhinged!

As far as I am aware she has never publicly made any statement about the post office scandal. I can imagine that if she did make a statement it would not be very coherent, but since I do not believe one has been made I'm not sure what you are referring to.

Given how Starmer's neolib Labour

You need to look up neoliberalism because you clearly don't know what it is.

decided they want to be the Truss/Sunak Tories on policy

What? Seriously what the actual hell does that mean? Truss didn't even have any policies she was only around for about 4 minutes. Meanwhile Sunak's policies altered depending on who the last person he talked to was.

she has a non-0 chance of becoming PM this decade!

The conservatives lost the election because they dicked around with the economy, slashed social benefits, messed about during the worst cost of living crisis in a generation, and engaged in culture war nonsense rather than actually dealing with the very real crisis that was unfolding in front of them. She is literally more of the same, an extremist who is constantly going off on her hunt to eradicate "wokism". Which is the evil boogeyman of the hard right.

So because she's the worst example of the previous administration, she's going to become PM. Are you drunk?

The only way the conservatives are going to get back into power is if they convince everyone that they've got rid of all of the extremist rubbish, and are now capable of acting like a real political party with adults. Electing an extremist is pretty much the opposite of doing that.

Not true. Someone pulled that off in 1930s Germany just fine.