top 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 25 points 3 years ago (3 children)

Considering verbal contracts are enforceable I'm not surprised the judge would rule this way.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago*

    Yeah, but I think it was a miscommunication. The contract was sent over text with “please confirm the contract”, but he was expecting a fax to sign and the thumbs up was a confirmation that he would sign it once he got it. Maybe I don’t know enough but I do kinda have to side with the farmer on this one.

    Edit: ok I read a bit more, maybe not as this article mentions that they’ve previously confirmed messages over text. Idk

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 3 years ago*

    That seems like the correct ruling. Any reasonable person would think that a thumbs up emoji equates to "yes", "good", "affirmative" or any other word of agreement. Trying to get out of a contract because you used an emoji is a complete dick move.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child)

    This is what I don't like about Teams on my android phone. There is no "Mark Read" button on the notification. It's either reply or like or open the app.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago

    I mean, yeah. Best practice to be more clear though

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    I mean, it's a touch screen on a buggy-as-hell smartphone. Argue accidental input.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    What if he had texted "👍🤣🤣🤣" or "👍 jk"? Or if the snarky thumbs-up was implied by the texter? There's a heck of a lot of room for ambiguity.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›