I've been a programmer since the 90s and I assure you, it's been mostly prayer and the occult since day 1. Also Adderall and whiskey.

I think the vast majority of scientists, at least computer scientists, would argue against the efficacy and accuracy of the Gregorian calendar.

It's more of a "we're stuck with it" situation than a testament to its scientific veracity.

US politics. Across the rest of the world, while politics may still be dumb out there, at least they're more likely to keep god out of it.

"I think God created the world" pitchforks raised "...WITH A COMPUTER!" pitchforks lowered

Simulation hypothesis is not science.

Simulation theory makes no inherent moral prescriptions or assertions about the ultimate origin of the universe - it just rolls everything up a level - This universe is a simulation inside the real universe... What created thecreal universe? We're not trying to answer that.

Theism tends to make moral prescriptions and point to an immutable god - This universe was created by God... What created god? It's god, dude.

This is why simulation theory and theism are compatible - there's no reason both can't be true - though we can never know if either is true, so just get on with your life and try to be a decent human.

religion has often replaced scientifically proven facts, wich is mainly due to religions powerful ability to not have to make sense and still be acceptable.

now as for religion actually disproving science, those occurences can be counted on zero hands.

A knowledge witch would curse you with knowing every embarrassing thing you ever did.

No, it wasn't. If you look at religious iconography, you see Jesus sitting on a globe regularly. Kings were endowed with globus cruciger, a representation of Jesus ruling over the globe. Sure there were some people who must have believed in flat earth but they were about as serious as the modern flat earthers.

Science still fundamentally has a better approach then religion. Even if the true cause of religion is a god science will find it. But it's honestly probably not sadly.

Define "not touched".