Well, this just got darker.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 257 points 2 years ago (14 children)

This isn't surprising, it's inevitable.

If you folks knew how common pedophilic fantasies are amongst the general public, you would be shocked. Just look to cultures like Japan and Russia that don't strongly condemn such things, and you'll find it's about 15% of the population. It's only less in the West because of the near homicidal stigma attached to it that makes people vigorously hide that part of themselves.

Fortunately, this also shows that the vast majority of those people don't offend.

We also tend to define pedophilia as "anything sexual involving a minor", while reacting to it as if it means "violent rape of a toddler", so no shit, we sexualize youth all the time, the 18 year mark is a legal and social formality, not a hard limit on human attraction. Adults will find themselves attracted to teens, and they won't reveal that because who the fuck ever would?

If anything, the issue isn't that people have these attractions and fantasies, it is that some portion of those people can't separate fantasy from reality and are willing to hurt a child to get what they want, or they are sociopaths that consume child porn without feeling disgust for witnessing horrific child abuse.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 72 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    I think the common incest fantasy in the west isn't too far removed from this too. Like all the actors are above age minimums but they pretend to be step kids or babysitters like these roles aren't commonly associated with children and older teens. It's clearly a form of deflection IMO.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Could also be that those are the only porns with even a half assed attempt at a plot instead of just opening with a ground and pound

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • load more comments (13 replies)
    [–] 166 points 2 years ago (38 children)

    I actually don't think this is shocking or something that needs to be "investigated." Other than the sketchy website that doesn't secure user's data, that is.

    Actual child abuse / grooming happens on social media, chat services, and local churches. Not in a one on one between a user and a llm.

  • source
  • hideshow 39 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago

    It's the "burn that witch" reaction.

    See how they hate pedophiles and not child rapists.

    The crowd wants to feel its power by condemning (and lynching if possible) someone.

    I'd rather want to investigate those calling for "investigation" and further violation of privacy of people who for all we know have committed no crime.

    That's about freedom of speech and yelling "fire" in a crowded theater and thousand hills radio, you know the argument.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (37 replies)
    [–] 73 points 2 years ago

    insert surprised pikachu face here

  • source
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Wait… so you meant to tell me that predatory simps are using AI incorrectly? Man…. If only someone could have called this years ago- something could have been done to minimize it!

    Who knew that unchecked growth could lead to negative results?!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 32 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    So it's less about outlets and more about progression. The concern is while plenty have an outlet they can use, we can't know how many also choose to escalate because of these outlets.

    That said, I do agree with you. However, I will always be more for understanding the disorder when no act has occurred and finding treatment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 31 points 2 years ago

    Not at all surprising but also it is an AI

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    Ain't that what are the tools there for. I mean I don't like cp and I don't want to engage in way with people who like it. But I use those llms to describe fantasies that I wouldn't even talk about with other humans.

    As long as they don't do it on real humans nobody is hurt.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The problem with AI generated CP is that if they're legal, it opens a new line of defense for actual CP. You would need to prove the content is not AI to convince real abusers. This is why it can't be made legal, it needs to be prosecuted like real CP to be sure to convict actual abusers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    This is an incredibly itchy and complicated theme. So I will try not go go really further into it.

    But prosecute what is essentially a work of fiction seems bad.

    This it not even a topic new to the AI. CP has been wildly represented in both written and graphical media. And the consensus in most free countries is not to prosecute those as they are a work of fiction.

    I cannot think why an AI written CP fiction is different from human written CP fiction.

    I suppose "AI big bad" justify it for some. But for me there should be a logical explanation behind if we would began to prosecute works of fiction why some will be prosecuted and why other will not. Specially when the one that's being prosecuted is just regurgitating the human written stories about CP that are not being prosecuted nowadays.

    I essentially think that a work of fiction should never be prosecuted to begin with, no matter the topic. And I also think that an AI writing about CP is no worse than an actual human doing the same thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 29 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    A bit off topic... But from my understanding, the US currently doesn't have a single federal agency that is responsible for AI regulation... However, there is an agency for child abuse protection: the National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect within Department of HHS

    If AI girlfriends generating CSAM is how we get AI regulation in the US, I'd be equally surprised and appalled

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›