all 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 16 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Wow, Sony really shit the bed on this one.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    I'm OOL, what happened that was this bad? I'd heard it wasn't popular, like it just didn't latch onto the market (reasonably, due to oversaturation), but was there something functionally wrong with the game?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago

    Functionally no, the game doesn't appear to have crazy massive bugs.

    It's just another bland live service hero shooter, that was extremely poorly advertised (personally I never heard of it until a week after it came out). I think Sony thought that it's presence in their playstation store was enough to get it enough traction (to be entirely fair that did work with other, better games) to spread through word of mouth, but that requires the game is good.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Nothing was functionally wrong with the game.

    People have said it hasnt done anything much to separate itself from all the other free to play hero shooters to jusitfy its $40 price tag.

    People also aren't vibing with the character designs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Thanks, I still can't wrap my head around how it makes sense to pull the game and issue auto refunds. Unless PlayStation thinks it's so toxically bad that its mere existence is damaging to the brand.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 years ago

    There are less than 25000 copies sold. Less than 1000 people online at peak time. So, difficult to find matches for the players, yet Sony would liable to keep the servers up, and keep the devs working on the planned roadmap, which would be costing them a lot more than anything remotely close to what they earned.

    So, better to just issue refund, shut down the servers, and get devs to do something that has a chance to earn them something.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Uhhh i bet the guys responsible for suicide squad wanna do the same so badly, but they need to keep the game alive long enough so they don't have to give the money back.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Concord fans... Who are they even talking to?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Would it be possible to re-release this as a free-to-play? I might try it if it was free.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment