all 29 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 34 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (6 children)

They barely get funding for proper war equipments, I'm not surprised this happened. (To be clear, not doubting the Russian scientists skills in any way or form here, only their founding)

Edit: TIL, they're hemorrhaging scientists like crazy, which doesn't surprise me, just didn't check beforehand

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    They’re losing scientists by the bus load daily.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 3 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Haven't the Russians historically been very successful with their space program though? Don't forget the US relied solely on them for resupplying the ISS after the ending of the Space shuttle program until Space X. Also they had their own space stations like Mir long before the ISS. I thought that's why the US partnered with them as they had more experience

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I doubt them. Since the war I've met quite a few people in various fields that fled the country. Granted I've yet to meet a rocket scientist, but the brain drain seems very real.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 3 years ago

    Today Russia learned that you can't pilot a lunar lander using a TomTok GPS from 2007.

  • source
  • [–] [B] 15 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Russia's Luna-25 spacecraft has crashed into the Moon after spinning out of control, officials say.

    The unmanned craft was due to make a soft landing on the Moon's south pole, but failed after encountering problems as it moved into its pre-landing orbit.

    The spacecraft was scheduled to land on Monday to explore a part of the Moon which scientists think could hold frozen water and precious elements.

    Roscosmos, Russia's state space corporation, said on Sunday morning that it had lost contact with the Luna-25 shortly after 14:57pm (11:57 GMT) on Saturday.

    "The apparatus moved into an unpredictable orbit and ceased to exist as a result of a collision with the surface of the Moon," it said in a statement.

    Russia has been racing to the Moon's south pole against India, whose Chandrayaan-3 spacecraft is scheduled to land on there next week.


    The original article contains 174 words, the summary contains 141 words. Saved 19%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago

    Of course it did. I'm disappointed that I'm not surprised. I'm glad it was unmanned.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago
    [+] [B] -1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [+] -29 points 3 years ago (13 children)

    If US can't make it to south pole, these 3rd world countries will never be able to make it.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    have you seen the absolute state of Boeing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Well, now it's spaceX for space mission, but I don't think they ever made a landing anywhere, and they fail usually a couple missions before a success...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child)

    The fucking difference is space x worked their shit out before actually running the goddamn mission.

    How fucked must you be to think this is par for the course? I mean, it is for those fascists, but that is not how space missions are prepared for.

    Space x tested their shit on earth, shooting up and landing back down, etc. Once they got their shit worked out, ONLY THEN did they fly missions.

    Would you say the same stupid shit if they had just gone straight for the ISS and when it inevitably crashed, “oh well, that’s normal there are always critical failures in the first few actual missions”?

    Read a damn book or something

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    By definition, Russia is in fact a 2nd world country.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 3 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    The actual definition is First world countries are allied with NATO, Second world countries with the Russian federation (formally with the USSR), Third world countries are unaligned with either, and Fourth world are unrecognized nations like the sentinelese and tribal nations within the US.

    https://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/third_world_countries.htm

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    A strict application of this definition makes Switzerland and Sweden third world countries throughout the Cold War, so it's not really something you can use to describe modern usage of the term

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -7 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Who gives a shit. Its not US, No country can compete with US. We are the superior ones and everyone should know that. #MAGA

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (2 children)

    lol US is barely first world. can't even cover basic healthcare.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Fuck you. Turn on your TV whatever you see is US. We know that each and every of you wants to be an American but it'll just be a dream. We have insurance to cover for healthcare and the only people complaining about it are dirty poor illegals. #MAGA

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment