this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2020

1 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15910 readers

2 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Muslims: please dont depict Prophet Muhammad, its offensive, thank you Europeans: (hexbear.net)

submitted 4 years ago* (last edited 4 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

58 comments fedilink hide all child comments

here is the link, its locked by the way beware of the quasi-fascists that are the western europeans

edit: its really easy to attract the islamophobes in this chat

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 years ago (1 children)

What i find amusing and illustrative in this argument is replacing "draw Muhammad" with "saying the n-word" and it being the same fucking argument.

ok look i literally do not give a fuck what is offensive to your religion, ~~drawing a picture of some guy~~ saying the n-word is not immoral and anyone who suggests that it is can eat my entire ass

Basically we've got a lot of americans on this site who rightfully feel guilt at kicking disadvantaged people in their own country, but fuck off about caring about the disadvantaged people in other white imperialist countries, they can suck my dick if they don't like it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 years ago (2 children)

How the hell is satirising a highly questionable religious figure the same as the n-word now? We fans of religious authority now?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 years ago* (last edited 4 years ago) (1 children)

If you wish to undermine religious authority that means reducing the number of religious adherents.
These divisive tactics with insults, misrepresentations, and minority oppression are not effective towards those ends.

Islamophobia is playing into our enemies hands; they rule via divide and conquer.
As leftists what we should aim for is mutual understanding and cooperation.

We want religious (and non-religious) people to become more accepting, reasonable, and less reactionary.
Insults only put people into a defensive position. And this only empowers religious authorities.

When people publicly insult Mohamed, where do Muslims turn to for support and solidarity?

You have to be more pragmatic about this. There is no slippery slope when your position is rooted in utilitarian concerns.
If freedom of expression were meaningfully at risk then we could simply pivot our tactics.
Those who insult Islam have done nothing wrong; but those insulting Islam to hurt and marginalize Muslims within society are no better than any other bigot.

Terrorist attacks in response to such expression is already systematically opposed, so what more do you want?
Mosques and Muslim communities are already under surveillance throughout Europe.

Freedom of expression does not mean we have to celebrate every time somebody says something that offends others.
If anything, freedom expression used in this way and on such a scale, causing violence and social unrest, is what puts freedom of expression seriously at risk.

If I thought that via Mohamed cartoons within three years we would have millions more ex-Muslims; then absolutely publish away.
But this same shit has been going on for over a decade and I don't think it's working.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 years ago* (last edited 4 years ago)

Those who insult Islam have done nothing wrong; but those insulting Islam to hurt and marginalize Muslims within society are no better than any other bigot.

this sounds like a catch-22. if anti-Muslim criticism is indistinguishable from well intentioned one then it sounds easy to just accuse everyone of being anti-muslim.

Terrorist attacks in response to such expression is already systematically opposed, so what more do you want?

i want criticism of religion to be normalized.

If I thought that via Mohamed cartoons within three years we would have millions more ex-Muslims; then absolutely publish away. But this same shit has been going on for over a decade and I don’t think it’s working.

But it is. 10 years ago you wouldn't even hear of the concept of atheism or LGBT people, you'd never hear of people criticizing Islam at all and now you see people on TV do it. Now you see scholars scurry to prove Aisha was 18 when she had sex with Mohamed, declaring sexual harassment to be a sin and arguing maybe *don't * kills the gays and the converts. Normalizing topics works, of course there will be resistance. Sometimes violent but ultimately it works. Dawkins gets a lot of well deserved flack but his edgelord book and common public appearances did reach here, all the way in the Arab world. His book on atheism, got translated unofficially and downloaded over 10 million times from one site.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 years ago (2 children)

Ah we're calling bigotry "satire" now, that's clever.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 years ago (2 children)

ok look i literally do not give a fuck what is offensive to your religion, drawing a picture of some guy is not immoral and anyone who suggests that it is can eat my entire ass

i dont care if you're religious, but that apathy ends the second you start asking me to follow your dumb fucking religion's dumb fucking rules. fuck off

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 years ago (1 children)

i literally do not give a fuck what is offensive

eat my entire ass

fuck off

Civility at the expense of accomplishing something real is bullshit, but man, you're not going to get very far with very many people if you're just an outright asshole.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 years ago (1 children)

Do you understand how traumatic it is to grow up in an environment ruled, socially and legally, by religion? It's fucking horrifying. And then to see people who are supposed to be supporting you calling you racist, a chud, an asshole, etc for daring to suggest that religion shouldn't control the life of a non-religious person? That's terrifying too. I'm lashing out because this is truly a terrible, disgusting thing that people here are thoughtlessly supporting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 years ago (2 children)

religion shouldn’t control the life of a non-religious person?

yes, the evil muslims are preventing you from drawing muhammad which is something that non-religious people normally want to do on a regular basis

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 years ago

So if no one is preventing anyone from drawing caricatures why was showing a caricature in a class explicitly dealing with religious indoctrination punished? By death, no less.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 years ago (5 children)

He is from Alamaba, famous islamic state

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 years ago

al-Abama

load more comments (4 replies)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 years ago (1 children)

looks like asking to not draw Muhammad is to much for cringe zoners like you

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 years ago (1 children)

asking me to follow religious rules is absolutely too much, yes.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 years ago* (last edited 4 years ago) (36 children)

so if a japanese asks you to take of your shoes when entering his home, are you gonna call him an asshole too, to you basic decency is opression, and you want anyone from the global southto call you a comrade, radlib

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 years ago

The difference is that if you enter a Japanese person's house in shoes, it won't result in a random dude getting his fucking head cut off lol.

Here's what I don't understand, if someone says that something is offensive in their religion I'm obviously going to respect that because I'm not an asshole. But if they say that something is a crime in their religion and the punishment is getting beheaded then I'm super not cool with that. They are imposing on me the rules of their religion, which I'm not a part of.

It's the same way with Christianity and abortion or homosexuality. Everyone agrees that it's not cool that Christians are imposing their morality on the rest of the world, why is it different with Islam? That's an honest question, correct me if I'm being a lib.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 years ago* (last edited 4 years ago) (1 children)

What does taking your shoes off when entering someone's home has to do with their race? Why would you keep your shoes on, unless specifically asked in the first place?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 years ago

because its a respect thing (japanese tradition) just like not drawing muhammad is for muslims

load more comments (34 replies)

load more comments